User talk:Bearcat/Archive 35
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This can be speedy deleted G12 COPYVIO, and G11 blatant promotion. The entire page is a 98% lift from their website. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:56, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Move draft Caillou Pettis to Article
Hi. I was wondering if you could change http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Caillou_Pettis_(Canadian_filmmaker) to an actual article page. Thanks. MovieFan2018 (talk) 13:33, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, this is an urgent message the userpage titled User:Joey717. On User:Joey717 there is a category located in the bottom titled Category:People from Winnipeg. Categories are not allowed to add on userpages under WP:USERNOCAT. So go to the user page titled User:Joey717 and remove the People from Winnipeg category. Category are not allowed to add on userpages. This is an urgent message. please do that immediately. Thanks. 2001:569:7C07:2600:C084:6CAA:20CB:AAE (talk) 02:36, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Sources Fixed
Thanks for your feedback, replaced most sources and added in new ones. Should suffice Krislbarg (talk) 16:52, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Political candidates
Hi. Just wondering why we have to discount campaign sources in candidates articles and why they are held to a higher standard of notability than GNG. I seem to remember some candidates being deleted at AFD and some kept, so it doesn't seem that there is a consensus that they are not notable. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 16:19, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- I see your point, but with regards to Mary Gay Scanlon the coverage is greater than just routine reporting -- there is also biographical information as well. There is also coverage with regards to her candidacy in the larger scope of the so-called "Year of Women" as well as a profile in the Penn Law Journal, for starters. Deleting information that is well sourced and aids voters is not helpful for the encylopedia, it is actually harmful. Guess we are going to have to agree to disagree on this one. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 16:45, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- That's not an official policy, just an essay some guy wrote. And yes, I believe people will still be interested in Mary Gay Scanlon 10 years hence. For the majority of losing candidates, that would not be the case. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 16:56, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- I did not mean to imply that we can simply disregard the essay because it was an essay, just that it did not have the full weight of a policy. I attempted to create a discussion about the subject at WT:AFD but I haven't had much success. You have an absurdyly high level of standard for candidates above and beyond many other guidelines (for instance, settlements just need to exist) but as I said before I think we will need to agree to disagree. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 17:19, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- That's not an official policy, just an essay some guy wrote. And yes, I believe people will still be interested in Mary Gay Scanlon 10 years hence. For the majority of losing candidates, that would not be the case. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 16:56, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Please claim your upload(s): File:Rmsudbury.png
Hi, This media was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices,
However, due to changes in the copyright situation in some jurisdictions, there is a need to ensure media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed. It would be appreciated if you were able to confirm that it was your own work, by marking it as {{own}}, Fully completeing the {{information}} block, and leaving an acknowledgement on the file description page to indicate that you've accepted the license shown (and updated the {{information}} accordingly. If you have other uploads, please consider "claiming" them in a similar manner, You can find a list of files you have created here.
If you don't want to keep your media on English Wikipedia, please nominate it for deletion under Criteria G7 of the Criteria for Speedy deletion ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:47, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Text copied from source
This section has text copied from the cited source. I believe there's a process to remove and tag this kind of edit as copyvio? // sikander { talk } 18:01, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Carmen Maria Montiel
Question are you voting to Delete or keep Carmen Maria Montiel page? You started with "Delete" but your comments reads that she is eligible. Thanks DilmaEmperatriz (talk) 15:14, 15 September 2018 (UTC)DilmaEmperatriz
Sea squirts listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sea squirts. Since you had some involvement with the Sea squirts redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 01:07, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wolastoqiyik Lintuwakonawa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sampling (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
RfD
Since you commented on the Mezőceked ( RfD I have added the similar redirect Petele ( to the discussion. You may (or many not) wish to comment further. Thryduulf (talk) 22:27, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
I wanted to personally thank you for undertaking the task of turning the list into sections by decade. Doing so was not only a bright idea, but also a generous gift of your time and will be very helpful to all of us who care about the quality of the list. Pyxis Solitary yak 09:45, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Amarjeet Sohi
Please forgive me, but I spotted this and at first was really confused and then glanced and just started laughing and laughing and laughing. Completely understand where you're coming from and have more than a few of those moments. Thank you! Ravensfire (talk) 15:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Can you respond on the AfD discussion page? Thanks. AkoyIanS (talk) 17:55, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highways in Ontario, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Humber River and Wolfe Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
| Congratulations on your millionth edit! ϢereSpielChequers 08:24, 25 September 2018 (UTC) |
Hello Bearcat. As a contributor to the John Bourgeois AfD discussion, your input at its MfD discussion would be appreciated. Thank you. --Bregnac (talk) 20:10, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
National Library of Northern Ireland listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect National Library of Northern Ireland. Since you had some involvement with the National Library of Northern Ireland redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Addedentry (talk) 22:50, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Oops
Sorry about this[1], my browser window jumped around a bit when I tried to click a page on my watchlist, so my cursor kept missing the page I was trying to click and I hit rollback on ANI by mistake, but self reverted[2]. CFD is also on my watchlist, so I must have clicked rollback twice and also hit CFD. Tornado chaser (talk) 00:11, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
| Congrats on 1mil edits! You deserve the barnstar for it! Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs) 04:00, 28 September 2018 (UTC) |
A feature to know about WP:DRAFTNOCAT
You recently removed the categories from the page Draft:Accord Financial in accordance to WP:DRAFTNOCAT. While your edit is totally legit, there is however a softer option than merely removing categories which is keeping them hidden by either commenting or disabling them as specified in WP:DRAFTNOCAT, while waiting for the article to be moved to the article space. SO I've undone your removal and hid categories accordingly ;-)
--Pascal PERRY (talk) 23:37, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Category:Coffee houses of Austria has been nominated for discussion
Category:Coffee houses of Austria, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 15:20, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Category:Coffee houses of France has been nominated for discussion
Category:Coffee houses of France, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 15:21, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
ROXI draft article for review
Hi Bearcat,
Thank you for looking at/editing the ROXI draft article. Can you let me know if there's anything else needed before it can be reviewed/approved? Many thanks Tho2009 (talk) 15:19, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:41, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Request for comment on new article
Would you mind looking at this article? Zoe Todd --Parkbenchmonster (talk) 17:47, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Four years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:23, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Can you please stop unintentionally pissing me off on 42nd Quebec Legislature page.
Can't you please don't pissed me off on 42nd Quebec Legislature page over recount trivial fact because I worked on getting right with some help. And can you please Uppercase your first word for every reasoning on your edits and undos, even you are likely Quebec French native speaker (mainly how you write) but please for now on trying uppercase them in English Wikipedia before some Users will mistaking you of trolling. Chad The Goatman (talk) 06:21, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Sue-Anne Levy
Hi, you erased an entire paragraph that was added recently on Sue-Anne Levy's page about her viral article falsely spreading the claim that refugees in Toronto were slaughtering goats in their hotel bathrooms - and that very soon after the article's publication, an arson attempt was made on the hotel.
You claimed it was poorly written (which, depends on your standards) and 'unreliable sources' (that were: rabble.ca, Press Progress, Buzzfeed, Vice, and the two direct links to her articles). I don't think those qualify as unreliable (the first two, you might not know of if you're not into Canadian politics, but they are more reliable than, say, Levy). You also seem to have erased the edits so much that they aren't even viewable on the history of the page (!?) so no-one else can look at whether it was poorly written or what the sources were.
I think this incident is very worthy of noting on Levy's page, particularly the timing of her two articles, and how they coincided with the presence of white supremacists at the hotel doing their own media attention-seeking.67.230.128.96 (talk) 15:30, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
BRD on Alex Paxton-Beesley
You were bold, I reverted and started a discussion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:00, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Kris Brownlee
I believe that this article was rejected in error. The last time that this article was rejected in March, the reviewer said it was because it did not show the artist's chart-topping status. Now it does. This artist is currently on the top 50 charts on smoothjazz.com which is the number one source for all things smooth jazz, including chart status notability. Radiowave and Smooth jazz network are not blogs either. These are all real legit charts as either reported by "Nielsen Ratings" or by "The Gavin Report". There are musician's pages on Wikipedia that show far less credibility/notability, for example John Ellis(saxophonist). How did this article even go through? It does not meet the standards you claim. I kindly ask that you reconsider your decision. Thanks!Saxy61 (talk) 17:44, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for sending me the WP:NMUSIC's and the WP:Record charts information. Very useful. By these definitions there are a lot of Wikipedia musician's pages, especially jazz artists' pages that need to be deleted. As they never have and never will reach this level of notability. Just sayin'. I will resubmit once this artist, Kris Brownlee charts on Billboard. Thanks! Saxy61 (talk) 03:25, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Review of Draft:Dharitri Terangpi
Please review the draft article of Dharitri Terangpi. Vrisle (talk) 03:55, 17 October 2018 (UTC)