User talk:Belvdme

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


sources for clarinet choir information[edit]

  • Abramson, Armand R. A Better Use of the Clarinet Choir, The Instrumentalist 19 (October 1964): 67-70.
  • Ayres, Thomas A. Clarinet Choir Literature. The Instrumentalist 18 (April 1964): 83-85.
  • Bellison, Simeon. The Clarinet Ensemble. New York: Simeon Bellison, 1945.
  • Borkowski, Francis. An Approach to Blending on the Clarinet. The Instrumentalist 18 (January 1964): 85-86.
  • Cailliet, Lucien. The Clarinet and Clarinet Choir. Kenosha, Wisconsin: Leblanc Publications, Inc., 1955.
  • Cailliet, Lucien. The Need for Adequate Instrumentation. Music Journal 26 (December 1968): 47.
  • De Jesu, James. Improved Clarinet Sections Via Choirs. The Instrumentalist 7 (October 1952): 26.
  • Gilbert, Richard. Clarinetists Discography II. New York: The Grenadilla Society, 1975.
  • Gilbert, Richard. The Clarinetists Solo Repetoire. New York: The Grenadilla Society, 1972.
  • Gillespie, James E. Solos for Unaccompanied Clarinet: An Annotated Bibliography of Published Works. Detroit: Gillespie, 1973.
  • Heim, Norman. Clarinet Choir Potpourri. Woodwind World Brass and Percussion 19 (May-June 1980): 14-16.
  • Heim, Norman. The Clarinet Choir. The Instrumentalist 39 (February 1985): 32-35.
  • Heim, Norman. The Clarinet Choir. Woodwind World Brass and Percussion 14 (April 1975): 8-14.
  • Heim, Norman. The Clarinet Choir and Its Emerging Repertoire. Woodwind World Brass and Percussion 16 (November 1977): 6-7.
  • Heim, Norman. The Clarinet Choir Phenomenon. The Instrumentalist 34 (November 1979): 29-33.
  • Howland, Russell S. The Clarinet Choir-Its Development and Use. The Instrumentalist 18 (November 1963): 78.
  • Jennings, Vance. The Clarinet Choir Movement. National Association Of College Wind and Percussion Instructors Bulletin 11:4 (March 1963)
  • Jones, Marquis E. Clarinet Choir: An Emerging Art Form. Music Journal 26 (October 1968): 68-71.
  • Lamneck, Esther E. Survey of the Music for Two Clarinets, Published ca. 1780-1825, by the Clarinetist-Composers Blasius, Lefevre, Michael, and Vanderhagen (D.M.A. diss., The Juilliard

School, 1980).

  • Morgan, John. The History of the Clarinet Choir. The Instrumentalist 21 (February 1967): 42-43.
  • Palanker, Edward S. The Towson State College Clarinet Choir., Woodwind World Brass and Percussion 14 (April 1975): 22.
  • Randall, David Max. A Comprehensive Performance Project in Clarinet Literature with an Essay on the Clarinet Duet from ca.1715 to ca.1825 (D.M.A. diss., The University of Iowa, 1970).
  • Scruggs, Tina Gina Adkisson. An Annotated Bibliography of Original Music for Solo Clarinet Published Between 1972 and 1977 (D.M. diss., The Florida State University, 1992).
  • Weerts, Richard. The Clarinet Choir. Journal of Research in Music Education 12:3 (Fall 1964): 227-230.
  • Weerts, Richard. The Clarinet Choir as a Functional Ensemble. The Instrumentalist 23 (March 1969): 55-61.
  • Weerts, Richard. The Clarinet Choir in the Modern Concert Band. Music Journal 23 (December 1965): 47.
  • Weiner, Lowell Barry. The Unaccompanied Clarinet Duet Repertoire from 1825 to the Present: An Annotated Catalog (Ph.D. diss., New York University, 1980).
  • Wilkins, Wayne. The Index of Clarinet Music. Magnolia, Arkansas: Music Register, 1975.
A couple of observations: At Talk:Clarinet choir#External links and "Sources", a discussion is underway regarding your list of sources. Can you weigh in? In the article, the authors who have no Wikipedia articles do not require so many redlinks. The bolding you have on source titles is unnecessary—titles of books and independent standalone works are italicized, while titles of articles within magazines and journals are put in quotes. No bolding. Dates are not italicized. More than that, the sources ought to appear as inline references so that facts in the body of the article can be traced to their source. Can you help move the appropriate sources to inline reference format? Binksternet (talk) 22:34, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's category system[edit]

Hi. Wikipedia's category system uses subcategories to keep main categories from getting too unwieldy. When categories get to certain sizes, they're split into multiple subcategories, and articles are put in the subcategories if at all possible, and not kept redundantly in the main parent category after being filed into the sub-categories. There are some exceptions for cases where the subcategory isn't really a strict subcategory, but the "nationality" and "style" subcategorizations aren't usually considered among them. See Wikipedia:Categorization and subcategories for details. --Delirium 00:53, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]




Clarinet Concerto (Copland)[edit]

Thank you for asking. Yes, I think I can: [1], [2]. A few years ago I was also told by M. Stefanovic that he had a letter from Copland regarding this Concerto, but, unfortunately, I have never got a copy of it.

By the way, as I can see, you are a clarinetist, i.e. we are colleagues. Can you tell me something more about yourself - are you studying somewhere, or teaching, performing?--Andrija (talk) 21:50, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Belvdme! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Flewis(talk) 11:44, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Clarinet Concerto K 622[edit]

I started a discussion on the trivia section of this article on the talk page. Themfromspace (talk) 11:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

chalumeau recordings[edit]

Do you own any chalumeau recordings? Do you have your own chalumeau, and if so, do you play it? Willi Gers07 (talk) 19:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I do not own and neither do I play the chalumeau (I used to play the clarinet). I do own a couple of chalumeau recordings (on the label "Pierre Verany" [PV796103, with works of Paganelli, Telemann, Fasch, Graupner, Hoffmeister; PV794114 with 3 overture of Graupner resp. for 1, 2, and 3 chalumeaux; PV796023 with works of Vivaldi] and Vox Temporis CD92 009 [music of Christoph Graupner] ) brian stormer (talk) 13:07, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, yes, I think I heard the Pierre Verany on the radio once. I must've thought it was a regular clarinet back then. Willi Gers07 (talk) 20:03, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template Clarinet[edit]

Can you take a look at these edits:http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Clarinet&action=history, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Clarinet&curid=7803467&action=history ? --Andrija (talk) 13:25, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Belvdme! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 944 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Dieter Klöcker - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:41, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:ClarinettistesBelges.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:ClarinettistesBelges.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:11, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Piet Jeegers[edit]

Notice

The article Piet Jeegers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that subject meets notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmertel23 (talk) 12:36, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Piet Jeegers for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Piet Jeegers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piet Jeegers (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 19:14, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Philippe Cuper[edit]

Notice

The article Philippe Cuper has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional, unref blp.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:39, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Belvdme&oldid=1215217560"