User talk:Bennv123/Archive 10
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
DYK for Death in Small Doses (1995 film)
On 20 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Death in Small Doses (1995 film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the film Death in Small Doses is a dramatization of the real–life death of Nancy Lyon by arsenic poisoning? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Death in Small Doses (1995 film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Death in Small Doses (1995 film)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
-- RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Tagging an article for undue weight, POV, etc requires a discussion with specifics on the talk page
A lot of editors don't know this. I reverted you at Snopes. Editors shouldn't have to guess what part of the article is meant and why. Doug Weller talk 11:54, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Ok, I read your edit summaries. I'd appreciate it if you'd post to the talk page about the issue. I've reverted the IP. Doug Weller talk 11:57, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Oliver Hailey
On 1 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Oliver Hailey, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that all three of playwright Oliver Hailey's Broadway productions closed after one regular performance? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Oliver Hailey. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Oliver Hailey), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
-- RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
NPP Award for 2022
|
The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
| For over 100 article reviews during 2022. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC) |
New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023
Hello Bennv123,
- Backlog
The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.
- 2022 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!
Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)
New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js
Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.
Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.
- Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Back Again Disciple
I noticed that you removed my article for “Back Again” by Disciple, due to use of Reader Reviews and Discogs as a primary source. I would like help on finding reliable sources and reviews as I could not find much, if you or another WikiUser would be so kind! DarnItAll34 (talk) 17:44, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- @DarnItAll34: I'll have a look via the Wikipedia Library resources. No guarantees that I'll be able to find anything. Bennv123 (talk) 17:53, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
No guarantee but thanks, it was too difficult finding any reliable sources for the page I recreated DarnItAll34 (talk) 17:57, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- @DarnItAll34: The only review I've been able to find is this review that was published in Cross Rhythms magazine (issue #75). This review alone isn't enough to establish notability (see WP:NALBUM) though. Bennv123 (talk) 18:28, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Ok then, I guess the article can’t be recreated if there isn’t enough reliable sources. Thanks for trying, though! I’m new to this so any help would be appreciated DarnItAll34 (talk) 16:53, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Little Secrets (2001 film)
The article Little Secrets (2001 film) you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Little Secrets (2001 film) for comments about the article, and Talk:Little Secrets (2001 film)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Nineteen Ninety-Four guy -- Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 13:44, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of In the Best of Families (miniseries)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article In the Best of Families (miniseries) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cessaune -- Cessaune (talk) 13:02, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Poison Ivy: Thorns
On 8 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Poison Ivy: Thorns, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the writer of Poison Ivy: Thorns felt the titular DC Comics character was "tailor made for [her] interests as a nature-loving, gay makeup enthusiast"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Poison Ivy: Thorns. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Poison Ivy: Thorns), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 | |
| my women's day story |
Thank you for the article! - For the first time I have no DYK on this day (I stepped back) but remember a 2016 DYK, Hana Blažíková, a Czech who sang German music in Japan. Girls and women sang how Bach arranged Pergolesi's Stabat Mater to a new text paraphrasing Psalm 51, last Sunday. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:22, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Courage (2021 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rise and Shine.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive
| New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Search for Grace
On 29 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Search for Grace, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that to prepare for her role in the television film Search for Grace, actress Lisa Hartman Black underwent hypnosis? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Search for Grace. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Search for Grace), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Get to the Heart: The Barbara Mandrell Story
On 9 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Get to the Heart: The Barbara Mandrell Story, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that singer Barbara Mandrell thought that when she saw Maureen McCormick play her in her biographical film, "all [she was] going to be able to think about is Marcia Brady"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Get to the Heart: The Barbara Mandrell Story. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Get to the Heart: The Barbara Mandrell Story), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
-- RoySmith (talk) 12:02, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
DYK for In the Best of Families (miniseries)
On 13 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article In the Best of Families (miniseries), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the miniseries In the Best of Families was based on the book Bitter Blood which in turn is a recount of the real life murders of Fritz Klenner? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/In the Best of Families (miniseries). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, In the Best of Families (miniseries)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
DYK for 2022 NCAA Beach Volleyball Championship
On 13 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2022 NCAA Beach Volleyball Championship, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the USC Trojans team that won the 2022 NCAA Beach Volleyball Championship had been compared to the Marvel Comics' Avengers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2022 NCAA Beach Volleyball Championship. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2022 NCAA Beach Volleyball Championship), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
-- RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Saving Grace GA Nomination
Please note, this is not a review of your GA nomination as of yet but merely some recommendations on some changes that might be needed. The article is very well researched in terms of broadcast and production histories. I suggest adding any literary sources that can be available via google books. Also, the film itself is quite rare, having briefly been released on VHS before fading into obscurity, this is not mentioned in the article but it needs to be added with the proper sources. Anyways best of luck mate and happy editing. Paleface Jack (talk) 21:42, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Report Request
i want to ask if you could please give me your advice, i'm going through a difficult situation due to a user who has been wanting to ban me ever since i created my page, i had an issue with two other users months ago that was thankfully clarified and we all finished to agreed with one another, but he's using that past conflict to say and accuse me of edit warring and many more things, the user is unexperienced and only has had over 17 contributions but he consistently disruptives articles and fights with other editors if they revert his edits, i left an edit warring warning on his talk page but he didn't like it despite being well intentioned, and he reported me instead and started accusing me of being a bad user with a bad reputation, he's defaming me and left a message saying that he just reported me, i just want to ask if this behaviour is worth of reporting or blocking cause i never did anything wrong, i simply told him that there was no excusable or good reason to revert the edit of a contributor who's edit was well researched and backed up with reliable sources, yet he still kept on reverting just because he didn't agree with it. Lightlylove (talk) 20:52, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Lightlylove: Hi. Since you've already given your side of the conflict on the WP:ANI thread, I think it's best to heed the advice given by other editors on that thread (namely to stay civil and discuss issues on the article's talk page). Also remember that at the end of the day, Wikipedia is just a voluntary project (i.e. hobby) for us individual editors. If it is causing you a lot of distress, perhaps step away from the article/conflict in question for awhile for the sake of your wellbeing. Bennv123 (talk) 05:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Tink
I done some work to your Tinker Bell draft for you If you could help find some details for the Peter Pan section and reception section (maybe some lists of best Disney characters or best cartoon characters of all time) we could get this page move to main space Fan Of Lion King 🦁 (talk) 08:36, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Fanoflionking: Hi, I think you have me confused with User:Bmona12 who created that draft. Unfortunately Bmona12 has been blocked indefinitely. Bennv123 (talk) 08:54, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Oh sorry I found this draft a couple of days ago and just want to help get it to Wikipedia standards as I feel this version of the character should have her own page would you consider helping anywayFan Of Lion King 🦁 (talk) 09:00, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023
Hello Bennv123,
Backlog
Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.
Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.
Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.
You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.
Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).
Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord and #wikimedia-npp connect on IRC.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Your GA nomination of In the Best of Families (miniseries)
The article In the Best of Families (miniseries) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:In the Best of Families (miniseries) for comments about the article, and Talk:In the Best of Families (miniseries)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cessaune -- Cessaune (talk) 15:44, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
New pages patrol needs your help!
Hello Bennv123,
The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.
Reminders:
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
I have reverted and asked for a discussion on this. To cite one single source as the authoritative consensus is not a valid claim. There is no authoritative consensus.Wjhonson (talk) 14:26, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
More citations, maybe you meant Cleanup citations?
You tagged a film franchise article God's Not Dead (film series) with the "more citations" template a while back.[1] Another editor removed that tag not understanding why it was there.
I restored the tag on because the article actually has an excessive amount of citations that need cleanup (references to reviews dumped at the end of plot section paragraphs) which I am betting was your reason for tagging the article. I hope you will go back and make it clearer to that other editor, maybe use section specific or individual tags if possible? -- 109.255.172.191 (talk) 16:12, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- I tagged it because the tables in the "Films" section and "Additional crew and production details" section are completely unsourced. WP:V applies to content in tables too. Also, the claim in the "Origins" section that the film series was inspired by a book by Rice Broocks is also not supported by the cited ref at the end of the paragraph. Rather than introduce multiple {{citation needed}} tags, I just tagged the overall article. The article does have an excessive amount of citations in the MOS:FILMPLOT sections, which ironically do not require sources, but that was not my reason for tagging. Bennv123 (talk) 23:20, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oh. I thought maybe you had used that tag because there wasn't a suitable {{citation cleanup}} tag available. That isn't quite what I expected. From other film franchise articles I would not have expected the "Film" or Crew tables to need additional references as that information can be directly sourced from the films themselves and is usually uncontroversial. Maybe that tag isn't needed, I guess it depends on how strict you want to be about WP:VERIFY, but the article certainly still has multiple issues. -- 109.255.172.191 (talk) 20:22, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
| Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive |  |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
Your GA nomination of Get to the Heart: The Barbara Mandrell Story
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Get to the Heart: The Barbara Mandrell Story you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 19:03, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Get to the Heart: The Barbara Mandrell Story
The article Get to the Heart: The Barbara Mandrell Story you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Get to the Heart: The Barbara Mandrell Story and Talk:Get to the Heart: The Barbara Mandrell Story/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 20:41, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Get to the Heart: The Barbara Mandrell Story
The article Get to the Heart: The Barbara Mandrell Story you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Get to the Heart: The Barbara Mandrell Story for comments about the article, and Talk:Get to the Heart: The Barbara Mandrell Story/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 09:41, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Search for Grace
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Search for Grace you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 1TWO3Writer -- 1TWO3Writer (talk) 15:43, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Search for Grace
The article Search for Grace you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Search for Grace and Talk:Search for Grace/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 1TWO3Writer -- 1TWO3Writer (talk) 17:01, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Search for Grace
The article Search for Grace you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Search for Grace for comments about the article, and Talk:Search for Grace/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 1TWO3Writer -- 1TWO3Writer (talk) 07:23, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2022 NCAA Beach Volleyball Championship
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2022 NCAA Beach Volleyball Championship you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 18:41, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2022 NCAA Beach Volleyball Championship
The article 2022 NCAA Beach Volleyball Championship you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2022 NCAA Beach Volleyball Championship and Talk:2022 NCAA Beach Volleyball Championship/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 19:22, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2022 NCAA Beach Volleyball Championship
The article 2022 NCAA Beach Volleyball Championship you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2022 NCAA Beach Volleyball Championship for comments about the article, and Talk:2022 NCAA Beach Volleyball Championship/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 03:22, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Have a try of selective rollback
Hi, I saw you manually roll back lots of vandalism, it's really time consuming, why not have a try for selective rollback? It's on m:User:Dragoniez/Selective Rollback which can help you rollback all the edits from one person in a click. -Lemonaka 06:19, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive
| New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Italic title
Why shouldn't Italic titles be using in song titles? It's there for albums, books, slogans. Gadir (talk) 17:25, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Gadir: 1. See MOS:TITLE, specifically MOS:MAJORWORK (longer works like full albums and books use italic titles) vs MOS:MINORWORK (shorter works like individual songs and episodes use quotation marks); 2. Italic titles are not typically used for slogans, phrases or quotes as they are considered "shorter works". Bennv123 (talk) 18:03, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. And poems? Are these works accepted as books? Is italics necessary? But there are also poems that are short, like songs. I am not talking about books. Gadir (talk) 14:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Gadir: Depends on the length of the poem. MOS:MAJORWORK states that "long or epic poems" should use italic titles (and the specific example they give is the book-length epic poem Paradise Lost by John Milton). Meanwhile, MOS:MINORWORK states that "short poems" should use quotation mark titles (and the specific example they give is "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening" by Robert Frost). Bennv123 (talk) 15:18, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- And theater plays? Gadir (talk) 15:36, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Gadir: Theatre plays fall under MOS:MAJORWORK and thus use italic titles. Bennv123 (talk) 15:39, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hello again @Bennv123, how going? Excuse me, well short films? Gadir (talk) 14:35, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Gadir: Hi. You can read the list on MOS:MAJORWORKS to see what counts as a “major work” and should thus use an italic title. One of the listed items is “Films (including short films) and documentaries”, so short films should use italic titles. Bennv123 (talk) 14:38, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hello again @Bennv123, how going? Excuse me, well short films? Gadir (talk) 14:35, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Gadir: Theatre plays fall under MOS:MAJORWORK and thus use italic titles. Bennv123 (talk) 15:39, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- And theater plays? Gadir (talk) 15:36, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Gadir: Depends on the length of the poem. MOS:MAJORWORK states that "long or epic poems" should use italic titles (and the specific example they give is the book-length epic poem Paradise Lost by John Milton). Meanwhile, MOS:MINORWORK states that "short poems" should use quotation mark titles (and the specific example they give is "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening" by Robert Frost). Bennv123 (talk) 15:18, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. And poems? Are these works accepted as books? Is italics necessary? But there are also poems that are short, like songs. I am not talking about books. Gadir (talk) 14:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
New pages patrol newsletter
Hello Bennv123,
Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!
October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.
PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.
Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.
Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I see that you were a substantial contributor to the Co-ed group article, and thought you might have some insight applicable to the complementary Draft:Mixed-gender band, which I aim to finish in the next week or so. Cheers! BD2412 T 01:40, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- @BD2412: My contributions to Co-ed group were a long time ago. But if I have the time, I'll check out the draft and see if I have anything to contribute. Bennv123 (talk) 07:06, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- I have promoted Mixed-gender band, but it could certainly still use some expansion. BD2412 T 03:25, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
November Articles for creation backlog drive
Hello Bennv123:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
Italics in hatnotes
(Just in case you're not watching the page)
Re this edit of yours: WP:ITHAT states Words or phrases that are italicized within a normal sentence should be unitalicized within a hatnote.
(my emphasis) Paradoctor (talk) 06:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive
| New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:09, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Peranakan Aritcles
Kindly refer the term of Peranakan in Dewan Bahasa and Pustaka.
It come from malay word and not only consits of chinese ancestry but it is wide term
Definition: 1. descendants of a country's child and a foreigner:; 2. born in: young people ~ Melaka; 3. uterus (where the baby is in the stomach), womb: pain
Do refer to https://prpm.dbp.gov.my/Cari1?keyword=peranakan
Baba Nyonya aritcle
The article was moved from Peranakans. Peranakans are wide term and does not specificly for chinese ancestry . Kindly refer to meaning of the term at https://prpm.dbp.gov.my/Cari1?keyword=peranakan
Kindly refer the term of Peranakan in Dewan Bahasa and Pustaka.
It come from malay word and not only consits of chinese ancestry but it is wide term
Definition: 1. descendants of a country's child and a foreigner:; 2. born in: young people ~ Melaka; 3. uterus (where the baby is in the stomach), womb: pain
Do refer to https://prpm.dbp.gov.my/Cari1?keyword=peranakan
NPP Awards for 2023
|
The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
| For over 100 article reviews during 2023. Well done! Keep up the good work and thank you! Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC) |
Would you consider re-draftifying this? There are issues... - UtherSRG (talk) 14:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)