User talk:Besuto
Hi, if you feel this image should be deleted, you should take it to Images for Deletion. [[WP:MfD|Miscellany for Deletion does not have authority over it. Cheers! Redfarmer (talk) 09:37, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your suggestion. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). —Remember the dot (talk) 17:47, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined[edit]
I noticed that you tagged the page Image talk:MarioPArtyDS.jpg for speedy deletion with the reason "Stupid". However, "Stupid" is not currently one of our criteria for speedy deletion, so I have removed the speedy deletion tag. You can use Wikipedia:Images for deletion if you still want the page to be deleted. Thanks! — Tivedshambo (t/c) 08:13, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
124.181.26.71[edit]
{{helpme|This page is not already peotected. Please protect it.}}
- The 30 day protection that Yamla placed has expired. The protection seems to have served its purpose: this account has not been used to make any more disruptive edits. I'm sure if he becomes a problem again it will be handled promptly. Copied from 124.181.26.71. Hoof Hearted (talk) 15:59, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Excuse me?[edit]
Excuse me? I don't understand what purpose your post on my talk page was trying to serve. How are Australian ratings spam? Ratings are included in articles to provide (at a glance) a comparison of the different certifications that video games receive across a myriad of regions. How exactly is it spam? :/ Sillygostly (talk) 08:32, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Contacting blocking admin. Daniel Case (talk) 03:53, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Besuto (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please just unblock that IP address. The block on that address is DISGUSTING! I want it to be just 18 or so hours. Or just make the frigging block longer! I'd rather have it indefinite than 48 hours!
Decline reason:
Are you sure you want to be indefinitely banned from Wikipedia? Be careful what you wish for, because we have zero tolerance for violations of our Wikipedia:Sock puppetry policy. -- Netsnipe ► 12:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I... I am confused. Which IP address? The one in the previous section? It's been unblocked already. You're not blocked. You're making no sense. Make sense. --Golbez (talk) 22:29, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
{{helpme|Just block 124.180.116.122 indefinitely and protect its talk page indef. Do not unblock, do not unprotect.}}
Please take it to WP:ANI help me is not monitored by just admins. GtstrickyTalk or C 21:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Stop requesting that IP adddresses be blocked indefinitely. Do you not understand the concept of DHCP? Most ISPs do not assign static IP addresses meaning that some vandals can (if they know how) change their IP addresses whenever they want. In those cases we can range block, but at the risk of blocking thousands of other innocent people using the same ISP, so we administrators use it rarely. See Wikipedia:Blocking IP addresses for more information. -- Netsnipe ► 11:42, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Besuto (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not a sockpuppet of 98E. This account was created BEFORE 98E. So how could it possibly be a sockpuppet? I don't even KNOW 98E. Just like those users I mentioned. A user cannot evade a ban using an account that was created BEFORE their main account and was created by a person in some other country.
Decline reason:
On the one hand, you say you don't even know 98E. On the other, you state that you do know 98E because you know he is slightly older than you. You also seem to misunderstand our policy on sockpuppets, particularly that of meatpuppets, because you think that Super48 is blocked inappropriately when he admitted to being a meatpuppet of 98E. In any case, I agree with the admins below. — Yamla (talk) 14:20, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
And yeah, like I said, I am sick and tired of administrators abusing their admin powers by blocking users as "obvious socks" when they have ZERO proof that those users are socks.
- At the very least, you seem to have some interesting things in common with 124.180.116.122 (talk · contribs) and 58.168.128.66 (talk · contribs), and edit in some subject areas common for 98E socks. I don't recall claiming that 124.180.116.122 was a 98E sockpuppet, when I blocked it, and here you come along with a screaming defense that said IP absolutely is not 98E -- ironically, this sort of vociferous tone is a hallmark of 98E's sockpuppets. I'd be particularly interested to hear your explanation for your interest in 98E's case, and especially in why you seem to be the first to mention a connection between 124.180.116.122 and 98E. – Luna Santin (talk) 10:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
- Except there is absolutely no reason to accuse people of sockpuppetry without ANY proof of any form that they are sockpuppets, ESPECIALLY if they are NOT sockpuppets. If you saw the suspected sockpuppeteer and the suspected sockpuppet at the same time in real life, would you still believe that the "sockpuppet" was a sockpuppet of the sockpuppeteer? Would you do the same if you instead saw photos of them? As far as I know, 98E actually has NO sockpuppets. Those "sockpuppets" are people who admins seem to hate and then they abuse their power to block them. So this abuse of powers by blocking people as "sockpuppets" of people they don't even know is OVER. Besuto (talk) 10:39, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
PS. I know Jc iindyysgvxc in real life - he is my cousin. Besuto (talk) 10:41, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Oh, and how I came across the 98E case... I first knew about 98E when I did a Google search on "stop abusing the unblock template" (with quotes). I discovered Super48's talk page in that search. Super was believed to be a sockpuppet of 98E, despite all those claims that he was E's brother. I had to defend him by saying that he was NOT A SOCKPUPPET. GET IT INTO YOUR HEADS. STOP BLOCKING PEOPLE WITHOUT ACTUALLY KNOWING THAT THEY ARE SOCKPUPPETS. IF YOU ARE SUSPICIOUS, ASK THEM. BUT THE PROBLEM IS, THEY WILL ALWAYS SAY "NO" (EVEN IF THEY REALLY ARE A SOCKPUPPET). I guess this is where you got the "false accusation" usage.
This 98E is a VERY BAD GUY. Ever since he was blocked, some other people have been suspected as sockpuppets of him. I believe he wanted to be banned to get such people into trouble. So you really need to speak to 98E.
Oh, and I never said that 98E and 124.180.116.122 had a connection.
I am just a 20 year old from Melbourne called Andrew. And this 98E guy is slightly older than me. You see, I'm not even the same AGE as him! Besuto (talk) 11:28, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
So please stop. 'Cause if this continues, EVRYONE on Wikipedia will end up as a suspected sockpuppet of 98E! Besuto (talk) 11:49, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
- I am not familiar with you or with User:98E. But reviewing your edits, I noticed that you have made strong defense of 98E's sockpuppets, despite no apparent reason to care. That's something that sockpuppets often do; the most common reason to create a sockpuppet is to create another voice to agree with you, and in fact that is where the name comes from. You also seem to share areas of interest. I read your defense. It's true that your account was created before his, which is an argument against your being a sockpuppet, but then, it may simply be that you registered this account first, not that one. That has happened before. I tried to think of the circumstances under which I would google the sentence, "stop abusing the unblock template" and couldn't think of any reason that I would google that. So I'm just not sure, and will leave the final evaluation to users who are more familiar with you and/or with User:98E, and are better able to analyze the subtleties of editing patterns and writing style. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:42, 6 April 2008 (UTC)