User talk:BeywheelzLetItRip/October 2017

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user uses Huggle to fight vandalism.
This user uses Twinkle to fight vandalism.
This user edits using the gadget wikEd.
Trout this user
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

F5 or Purge



Deserve a trout, for you make a mistake yourself!

trout Self-trout


Smash!

You've been squished by a whale!
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something really silly.

BeywheelzLetItRip (What is it?) 13:13, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Another trout for your own stupidity!

trout Self-trout

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

BeywheelzLetItRip (What is it?) 21:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring...?

Hello. You've sent me a template message about the 3RR rule... for what? Where did I violate the 3RR rule? If you're probably referring to this, where I repeatedly reverted the IP 2601:89:c500:b636:2dc2:3f22:7a0c:ce3c, then that is clearly exempted from the policy. Per WP:NOT3RR, you are free to revert any edits that are considered vandalism without any regard to the 3RR rule (the IP was continually blanking without explanation, which is considered vandalism). Although you did revert the warning with an edit summary, I should tell you that you should be more careful on sending warnings similar to this for an editor who is just trying to keep vandalism on bay. Thanks! theinstantmatrix (talk) 21:09, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

I have reverted the three-revert warning edit in your talk page and I am so sorry for this. I have realized that the IP user 2601:89:C500:B636:2DC2:3F22:7A0C:CE3C is blocked for some time. You can view the revert in your view history page of your talk page. And yes, I have put a trout before this talk happened. Thanks for notifying! BeywheelzLetItRip (What is it?) 21:17, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

This is your third trout!

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Bey WHEELZ Let It RIP! 03:32, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Exhall Grange

Your are uncontactable. I suggest my personal experience of Exhall Grange is valid, and is more important that anything written by people who have never been there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimbobredneck (talkcontribs) 20:03, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

@Jimbobredneck: Both of your edits have been reverted by me and Dolotta because they are not reliable and you are just adding your own opinion. Also you should treat me and other Wikipedians with respect. See WP:5P and WP:CITE for more info. If you have any more questions, ping me again in this talk page. Cheers :) —Bey WHEELZ Let It RIP! 20:21, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

ANI

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.202.81.220 (talk) 01:34, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

@161.202.81.220: The result is part of WP:BOOMERANG. The suspect's (my) actions actually were good, while your "joke" actions are vandalism. You have been blocked for two days because you did not know the full policies of Wikipedia. I have told you THREE TIMES that editing is not a joke. However, you did not listen. What you did was to make fun of the encyclopaedia, which is strictly forbidden. Making jokes on WP is prohibited. Please consider this. See WP:FOOLR for more information. Thank you. Regards, —Bey WHEELZ Let It RIP! 11:21, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

About your message

Hi there. I received your message about the article Cisplatine War. I removed some content that was lacking references and apparently "made up". I am re-adding content regarding the removed text, as well as references to backing the new data. Sorry about "splitting" my edits in more than one "edit". -177.81.203.211 (talk) 23:32, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

@177.81.203.211: That is absolutely okay. I also unfortunately reverted another of your edits because it caused a citation error and broke an HTML element. I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia. Cheers :) —Bey WHEELZ Let It RIP! 23:35, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
@177.81.203.211: Undid my edit and fixed the HTML element and citation error. Is this okay? Thanks. Cheers :) —Bey WHEELZ Let It RIP! 23:41, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your help! -177.81.203.211 (talk) 23:43, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
@177.81.203.211: As always, you are welcome. I see that you are improving the text for the article, which is a good sign. Take care! Cheers :) —Bey WHEELZ Let It RIP! 23:45, 30 October 2017 (UTC)