User talk:Bhaz26

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Shuga (TV series), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 09:08, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Shuga (TV series), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 17:30, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Quinton Feldberg: Hi Quinton, I hope you are well.

I have just noticed that the editing work that i have done on the Shuga wikipedia page has all been reverted.

I have provided citations and links to all of the changes I made as well as information as to why each change was made.

Can you please inform me as to what I did that was wrong please so that I can avoid making similar mistakes in the future? If you are able to revert the page to the changes I have made that would be greatly appreciated.

Many thanks and looking forward to hearing from you soon.

Bhaz26 Bhaz26 (talk) 17:43, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CMCreator900, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Quinton Feldberg (talk) 17:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Quinton Feldberg:

Hi Quinton,

I am slightly confused. If I have understood it correctly than sockpuppetry applies to having multiple accounts, but I can assure you that this is the first account I have set up on Wikipedia. If you would like for me to provide any evidence then please let me know or if there is anyway to resolve any concerns I would be more than happy to do so. This is my first time using Wikipedia in this manner so I may have made a couple of errors, but following the note by Jim1138 earlier today, I, in good faith, entered all of the information with citations and links as I believed that this was the correct procedure.

Many thanks, Bhaz26 Bhaz26 (talk) 17:53, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Quack! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 18:02, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]