User talk:Bibliomaniac15/A history of RFA
Cool! I take it it's not finished yet and there'll be plenty more to come? —Giggy 05:41, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yes. Feel free to add or fix anything. bibliomaniac15 01:24, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Things I think need adding[edit]
- Old failed RFAs have odd names like Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Lucky 6.9.08 & Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Markalexander100.09 did we downlevel them with 1.0 being a successful RFA?
- At one point in time there were five RFA questions merged to three Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Candidate questions
- This page Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/map has some good data.
- Another history page Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Promotion guidelines
- Odd experiment Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Nomination cabal
- De-sysopping Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Inactive1
Cheers MBisanz talk 21:40, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Nobody cares, but a historical curiosity[edit]
In August 2006, the questions were moved from the bottom of RFA pages to the top: true, but actually Robchurch did that in February 2006 [1] but was reverted a few days later because people liked it better the old way (see the penultimate comment in this section). Crystal whacker (talk) 22:34, 21 January 2009 (UTC)