User talk:Bidnews

Welcome!

Hello, Bidnews, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as BidCandy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GouramiWatcher ^(Gulp) 12:43, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of BidCandy[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on BidCandy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GouramiWatcher ^(Gulp) 12:43, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bidding fee auction, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 12:04, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bidding fee auction. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bidding fee auction was changed by Bidnews (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860055 on 2012-04-27T12:31:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:31, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bidding fee auction. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

I appreciate that Wikipedia policies and guidelines are not necessarily easy to know your way around. There are three reasons why your addition of a link to a bidding fee auction company is inappropriate in the See Also-section of Bidding fee auction. 1) The section is a See Also, which means that it should only include internal Wikipedia links to existing articles. 2) There is a clear instruction in the section, reading "Please do not add links to individual companies here." 3) You appear to have a conflict of interest with the company.

Furthermore, please do not place inappropriate accusations of vandalism on other users' talk pages as you did here. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 12:33, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bidding fee auction, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. bonadea contributions talk 12:34, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on User talk:Bonadea. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia.

I'm sorry if the explanations of why your edits are against Wikipedia rules are not clear, but it should be eminently obvious that the reversals of your edits (by me and others) are not any form of vandalism. bonadea contributions talk 13:01, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming or advertising. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu ^t/_c 13:29, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]