User talk:Bigpeepz
January 2015[edit]
Hello, I'm Becky Sayles. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Chris Kyle— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 11:46, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Chris Kyle, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Kyle, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.10.58.43 (talk) 13:08, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Kyle.
Re your comment "Secondary and tertiary sources should not be used when primary sources are available" - please see WP:PRIMARY to find out what Wikipedia's policy is.
bonadea contributions talk 13:16, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. JohnCD (talk) 13:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Read WP:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle for how Wikipedia works. JohnCD (talk) 14:10, 12 January 2015 (UTC)