User talk:Bihnt123

March 2021[edit]

Your recent editing history at Bosnia and Herzegovina national football team shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Including edits udner an IP, you have 5 reverts in the last 24 hours. One more revert, and I will report to WP:AN3 Joseph2302 (talk) 22:27, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:52, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bihnt123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

About 3 users are pushing a template change on every national team with no input from other wikipedia users. I reverted the template changes only, and have added my input to the respective talk pages, which those particular users are engaging in. You are risking losing a loyal member of wikipedia, and these users will no longer make any edits to this page after the template is changed, even when reverting to the previous template they are undoing dozens of edits not just by me but others that updated statistics after the last game. They don't care and will not actively update this page, they only care about pushing a template which no one except the 3 of them has given any input on. Bihnt123 (talk) 22:55, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You don't address your edit warring. Being correct with your edits is not a defense, as every user in an edit war thinks that their edits are correct. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 00:58, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

3 people discussing it is still 2 more than just you, who is the only person arguing for your version. The point of a discussion at WT:FOOTY is to get a consensus in a place where lots of people will see the discussion. WP:OWN also seems to apply here. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The original users who were pushing this template come from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Football/National_teams and you didn't even give a day for other people to come in and debate this template change. Stop claiming WP:OWN, hundreds of people edit this page and I have never reverted anyone. Have fun allowing this page to decay as the users who pushed this change don't care about this page and only want to push this template change on every national team, I'm over this. Good job pushing legitimate wikipedia users out without so much as any discussion. Bihnt123 (talk) 00:14, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]