User talk:Billyzzzee

from b!||yzee,

founder: torontorox.com

founder: MUSICIANS IN BARS GETTING BEER

torontorox support local talent in Ontario, Canada with free promotions. MUSICIANS IN BARS GETTING BEER since 2012 hundreds of video interviews on youtube.com/billyzzzee

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:2018photo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:2018photo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 14:45, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:2018photo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:2018photo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 15:09, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:2018photo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:2018photo.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:57, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

Hello Billyzzzee. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Eric Alper, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Billyzzzee. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Billyzzzee|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Also re,owing references. Whpq (talk) 14:51, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Done what I can

Hey Billyzzee saw your post on my talk page. I found a Billboard article which was helpful, reading as a more secondary source than some of the current links on the article (transcripts of interviews with Alper or his blogs which we regard as primary sources and take with a grain of salt). Anyway I've used the Billboard article to verify some facts that were already there; to replace the dead-links; and to remove the deadlink tag. I've consolidated all those radio-station mentions as you requested and I think the article's beginning to look better. If you can refer me to an on-line article mentioned the Publicist of Year and Juno Award wins, then I'll drop that in. Can't help you much re the photo request as I stay away from uploading shots due to the copyright/permission hoops one has to jump through. Your best best is to upload to Wikicommons using an assertion that it's uploader's own work. Alper himself should probably do that - seems like he's rather adept with tech ! Other WP editors might steer you better on this than me. Cheers -Sticks66 13:14, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Oh yeah & when you post, if your sign your post (by typing four tildes) then we'll know it's you ! -Sticks66 13:14, 18 August 2021 (UTC)