User talk:BingBong321

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BingBong321 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I source my materials. I'm undoing other editors' vandalism, and I can clear my own talk page. I literally attempt collaboration but others seek intent on undoing any and everything that doesn't fit their personal agenda.

Decline reason:

In examining your edits, I would concur with Bbb23, due to things like these personal attacks([1] [2]) which do not indicate a willingness to collaborate. As I see little evidence that this will change, or even that you will admit that what you did was improper, I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 20:43, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BingBong321 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's been a few months. Why hasn't the block expired? BingBong321 (talk) 17:17, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. Multiple open requests. -- Scott (talk) 18:12, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-Administrator-Comment) The block does not expire because it has no expiry date set. To Your unblock Request: You were blocked for being WP:NOTHERE. If you want to get unblocked, then you need to adress the reasons for your block. Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:20, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BingBong321 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry for being a vandal. Won't happen again. BingBong321 (talk) 17:43, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You weren't blocked for vandalism. Did you read the blocking admin's rationale before you blanked it from your talk page? All of the reasons for your block are detailed here. It is those reasons you will need to address for an unblock to be considered. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:35, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BingBong321 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I won't "undo" people's edits in the future, even if I think they're wrong. That's what the Talk page is for (to discuss the details and flesh out what is accurate. BingBong321 (talk) 18:49, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You made that statement as you literally removed other people's edits. Even if we believed you'd stop, this is only a small part of why you were blocked. Yamla (talk) 20:40, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please stop blanking your page. Declined block appeals cannot be removed while the sanctions are in place; see WP:BLANKING.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:51, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BingBong321 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand what you want from me. You said I needed to address the reason for the block. I did and now you just say "No" BingBong321 (talk) 21:27, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

WP:NOTGETTINGIT. Please take it to UTRS. -- Scott (talk) 21:57, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

December 2018[edit]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

-- Scott (talk) 21:56, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

BingBong321 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23677 was submitted on Dec 29, 2018 13:28:58. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 13:28, 29 December 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

BingBong321 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23706 was submitted on Jan 03, 2019 21:50:23. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 21:50, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I today spoke to someone in the #wikipedia-en-unblock IRC channel who said that they were BingBong321 and that they hadn't received any email replies to the UTRS tickets. I find that difficult to believe, but I reiterated the gist of the email replies. Huon (talk) 20:31, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]