User talk:Binodboss

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Binodboss, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you created appears to be an article about yourself. This is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. Your user page, however, is a great place to write about yourself, making sure to stay within user page guidelines. Just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit it normally.

The page you created about yourself has been or will shortly be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, but if you want to use the content from it, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Filing Flunky (talk) 12:26, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:28, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as AXIS MEDIA NEPAL, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:38, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Binod khadka[edit]

The article Binod khadka has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:40, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Binod khadka[edit]

Hello, Binodboss, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Binod khadka whether the article Binod khadka should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Binod khadka, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Sven Manguard Wha? 12:40, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Personal note[edit]

It looks like you're having a little trouble in getting started at Wikipedia. Start by reading some of the links in your welcome message, about how Wikipedia works. Then, as you work to make the encyclopedia better, try to avoid writing about your own company, and make sure to always cite reliable sources that confirm the information you add or change. Thanks! -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:41, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback[edit]

Help:Getting started - Maybe this will help you. If you want any further or more detailed directions, feel free to ask me here

TheOriginalSoni (talk) 20:25, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Deepa Panta Tezi.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Deepa Panta Tezi.jpg, which you've sourced to Facebook. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chhadke nepali movie[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chhadke nepali movie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:19, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Apparition11. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Teej, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 01:27, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Ascii002. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Shree Krishna Shrestha, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. —Ascii002 (Talk • Contribs • Sign my Guestbook) 01:48, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you are adding references in Shree Krishna Shrestha from a same website i.e. videotune. There are other sources too which are much reliable and your addition of links is without any information. If you add any links, you also add the info presented in the link. Thanks! —Ascii002 (Talk • Contribs • Sign my Guestbook) 01:26, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Binodboss, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

—Ascii002 (Talk • Contribs • Sign my Guestbook) 01:45, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Anju Panta may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Anju Pant's Song Collection Websites <ref>http://www.nepaltune.com/search/label/Anju%20Panta/}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:17, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Anju Panta. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 01:33, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Non Resident Nepali. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 02:07, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Deepa Panta[edit]

The article Deepa Panta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NARTIST, no reliable sources located on a search. All sources in the article previously were spam (a youtube link and some other unrelated site) so I've removed them.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:12, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]