User talk:BlackfullaLinguist

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, BlackfullaLinguist! Thank you for your contributions. I am Kerry Raymond and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Kerry (talk) 23:59, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Indigenous content

Hi, it's great to see someone contributing to the Indigenous content here on Wikipedia. It's an area that is underdeveloped. Can I ask though if you can please add the source for the information you are adding. I see you are using the Visual Editor. If so, after you add some new information, could you click on Cite > Manual and then use Web, Book, etc as appropriate to provide the source information. If the source information isn't one of Web, Book, etc, then use Cite > Manual > Basic which gives you a text box and you can just write whatever you like there about where the information comes from. If you need help with citations (or anything else), just say so here. I will be happy to help. Kerry (talk) 00:04, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello Kerry!,

Thank you for your welcome, introduction and advice. I've spent the better part of today going over some of the initial links you posted, they were very useful, thank you. I can see that a lot of the Indigenous articles are very much just stubs, and are not very accurate as they are. I hope to change that, I own quite a lot of material (most of it out of copyright, so if you can explain how I could possible take photos to use in some of the articles, they would be much appreciated. I thought some of the original tables and maps might be useful - if this isn't right, please explain.) My goal really is to build Wikipedia's capacity to educate people on Indigenous people's and culture, a lot of the material is hard to access or not in print anymore, so making it available on Wikipedia (with citations) would be my ultimate goal.

I've just been adding citations to the Yugambeh language page. Would you mind telling me if they are satisfactory, or if not, what I could do to improve them BlackfullaLinguist (talk) 04:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

They are OK. Could be some improvement in the formatting, but the main thing is that there is enough information there to send a person looking for the source to the right place. You can use Cite > Reuse to make a 2nd/3rd use of the same source. You don't have to use the way of doing things. One thing that stands out is that for Australian content we use the date format "18 September 2017" not other variants. But here on Wikipedia, people "give" according to their abilities. Some are content writers (like me), others do maintenance tasks, etc. So long as you do your best with a citation, others will tidy up after you if they think it needed. Pretty clearly you are going to be a content writer so focus on good content and let formatting of citaitons be sorted out by those who enjoy that sort of thing. Kerry (talk) 05:24, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

As to photos, yes, if the original material is definitely out of copyright, you can take photos of tables and maps and we can upload them and use them in articles. Generally with books, they are out of copyright 70 years after the death of the author, although it can be different in other circumstances, e.g. a government publication. If you can get a scan or digital photo of such a table/map, I am happy to teach you the steps involved in uploading the photo and using it in an article. Kerry (talk) 05:36, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

hi BlackfullaLinguist, a kitty for your additions to Yugambeh people, thankyou!

Coolabahapple (talk) 00:48, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Minor edits - some advice

I notice you mark many of your edits as minor which are probably not minor. A minor edit is one that changes the presentation of the information rather than its meaning. So spelling/grammar fixes, fiddling with formatting etc are minor, but adding/changing/deleting information is not minor. If in doubt, don't mark it as minor. A lot of vandals and other bad-faith contributors use the "minor" flag to try to fly under the radar of the page reviewers, so overusing "minor" especially when the edits aren't minor tends to attract suspicion. Kerry (talk) 00:32, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for that. My bad, I thought minor was for marking small edits. I'll put this into practise now. BlackfullaLinguist (talk) 01:37, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

No worries, I realised you probably didn't know that. Keep up the good work! Kerry (talk) 01:43, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kombumerri clan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gold Coast (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, BlackfullaLinguist. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Yugambeh-Bandjalangic peoples

Thanks for creating Yugambeh-Bandjalangic peoples.

A New Page Patroller Meatsgains just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 01:39, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I appreciate the work you do on Aboriginal Australian groups. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 01:53, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Yugambeh people

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from here and here. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:14, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

Your addition to Yugambeh people has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:08, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

GA Zoroastrianism Review

Hello!

I have made suggested edits and added citations and the like on Zoroastrianism. Please let me know what you think now. Xhepablo (talk) 23:40, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi! Letting you know I've resolved the problems you mentioned in the article! Xhepablo (talk) 18:57, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

6 GAs as a first time reviewer

Hi there,

I spotted that the number of GA nominees under review had suddenly spiked upwards, and I see that is heavily because of you.

It's fantastic that you're taking on a GAR, but I'm worried that 6 at once might be too many given the need to do fairly in-depth reviews to check an article actually complies with various MOS and source-checking requirements - as well as the reading well aspect. There's a few good structures recommended - Talk:Prince (New Girl)/GA1 is quite common, I like tables so I went for Talk:Roman Tmetuchl/GA1 since it breaks it down nicely. Which set-up doesn't really matter, but it's helpful to show you've checked each of the good article criteria. Nosebagbear (talk) 20:48, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

• • As someone with a grand total of 2 GA reviews under my belt, I would agree that taking on 6 at one time does seem like a lot of work. Mujinga (talk) 14:40, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Social Centres in the United Kingdom

Hiya, it's been 7 days since you put the review of Social Centres in the United Kingdom on hold so I thought I'd drop you a line to say I've complied with what I thought you were asking me to do on the article and I'd be interested to hear the next steps. Since from the section above I see you have some other reviews also in motion I'd like to emphasise it's not superurgent or anything, but I'd just like to move things forward when you have the time. Cheers! Mujinga (talk) 14:45, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Hiya, I replied to your further questions on August 11 so I'm waiting for a reply. Cheers! Mujinga (talk) 15:54, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Hiya I'd be more than happy to continue the review with you but since nothing has happened since I replied to your questions on August 11, I've taken the step of requesting a new reviewer. If you want to come back as the new reviewer that would be great! Mujinga (talk) 11:21, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi BlackfullaLinguist,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:28, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi BlackfullaLinguist,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi BlackfullaLinguist,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Yugambeh people

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Yugambeh people you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Fiamh -- Fiamh (talk) 05:00, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Yugambeh people

The article Yugambeh people you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Yugambeh people for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Fiamh -- Fiamh (talk) 01:21, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Zoroastrianism

Hi BlackfullaLinguist, Just wanted to know where we were at with Talk:Zoroastrianism/GA2. AIRcorn (talk) 07:14, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Danggan Balun - QC2017-007 Claim Area.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Danggan Balun - QC2017-007 Claim Area.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 01:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Candace Kruger moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Candace Kruger, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 06:36, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Question

Hi. With your addition to the clans in the Gubbi Gubbi article, I tried to find the citation to cite properly. I don't have access to Mathews (2007), but did see some of them in Mathews (1910), p. 129-30. Would you mind please clarifying by adding to what I have done there? I find it a bit confusing with so many spellings, and am not sure whether all of the ones above should be sourced to Tindale (I see some overlap with Mathews). Thanks! Laterthanyouthink (talk) 02:48, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Candace Kruger

Hello, BlackfullaLinguist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Candace Kruger, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Rory O'Connor (author) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rory O'Connor (author), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:16, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Rory O'Connor (author)

Hello, BlackfullaLinguist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rory O'Connor (author), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

First Nations focus group

Hi @BlackfullaLinguist, Wikimedia Australia is supporting a focus group to hear from Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people editing or using Wikipedia. I saw your recent edits and thought you might be interested.

The focus group is being led by Professor Bronwyn Carlson from Macquarie University, and we hope you might be interested to take part or can share this with your network. All participants will be paid.

You can view an invitation flyer with more information here: https://wikimedia.org.au/wiki/Focus_Group_Invitation

Cheers, Jimmyjrg (talk) 07:03, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)