User talk:STLDanni

March 2016[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:John Hill (coach), from its old location at User:Blankpagestl/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 02:57, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Hill (coach) (March 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Hill (coach) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:38, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Blankpagestl, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:38, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Hill (coach) (April 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Happysquirrel was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment they left was:

Please present the facts factually and neutrally. Value judgments such as a team being memorable, is known as etc. don't belong.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Hill (coach) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Happy Squirrel (talk) 23:34, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Blankpagestl (talk) 12:10, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looked for peacock terms and edited out. If I missed any instances specifically, would appreciate concrete feedback. Thank you.

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Hill (coach) (May 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by St170e was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Hill (coach) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

st170e^talk 12:40, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Blankpagestl, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 18:40, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm 220 of Borg. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Hibbs Homes. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 18:41, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! This is helpful!

Blankpagestl (talk) 19:10, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No worries!

220 of ^Borg 09:32, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hibbs Homes for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hibbs Homes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hibbs Homes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Meatsgains (talk) 22:44, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Meatsgains - Please see additional sources including a highlight from Time Magazine, Scholar documents showing US Department of Energy Advising, and additional details on White House consulting. Appreciate the feedback. Am brand new to this. Looking to find additional credible (and possibly academic sources) I saw previously. More to come. Any feedback is always appreciated. STLDanni (talk) 23:42, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for providing additional sources, which strengthens the page's verifiability. It's looking better! I'll take my other comments to the AfD discussion. Let me know if you have any questions. Meatsgains (talk) 14:01, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hibbs Homes[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hibbs Homes, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:35, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hibbs Homes Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hibbs Homes Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:John Hill (coach)[edit]

Hello, STLDanni. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "John Hill".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 15:35, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Advertising mail. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Kuru (talk) 11:09, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reid Muchow, Musician[edit]

Reid Muchow is an American musician based in Springfield, IL. He is a percussionist, guitarist, pianist and vocalist.

With a background steeped in funk, blues, hip-hop and jazz, Muchow has played and toured across the U.S. with the all-star funk group The Heard as well as Chicago soulsters The O'My's, blues virtuoso guitarist Nick Perraino, and hip-hop icons The Cool Kids and The Palmer Squares. Often found playing in Chicago and Springfield, IL, Muchow plays regularly with international touring Memphis-based blues recording artist Brandon Santini's touring band.

Discography Reid Muchow played drums on ZZ Ward's 2012 Album Til the Casket Drops, which generated three singles, "Put the Gun Down" which reached number 7 on the Billboard Adult Alternative Songs, "365 Days" which reached number 4, and "Last Love Song" which reached number 15.[7][8]