User talk:Blitzio

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Playware Studios Pte Ltd.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! TheOneSean ^{[ U | T | C ]} 19:52, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on Playwarestudios Asia Pte Ltd article[edit]

Hi Theonesean,

Thank you for your feedback on my article Playware Studios Asia Pte Ltd, I've made edits as per your suggestions to give it a more encyclopedic tone. I hope you can reconsider.

Link to article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Playware_Studios_Pte_Ltd

Thanks and best regards,

Blitzio (talk) 09:37, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blitzio, it looks good. It's not good for the same reviewer to rerev the same article over and over. I'm sure someone else will review it soon. If it goes more than a week, contact me again and I'll take a look. Thanks, TheOneSean ^{[ U | T | C ]} 05:26, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I received your email[edit]

I prefer to discuss things "on-wiki." If you need to reach me in the future, please post on my talk page or where there is already a discussion. You can also add an {{afc comment}} to your submission right above the text of your submission and below any existing "afc comment" templates. I will likely leave this submission for another reviewer to review.

By the way, the OTRS permission regarding File:Playware Studios Asia Pte Ltd Logo.png will need to come from the copyright owner, not from you (unless of course, you are the owner). Also, until the OTRS permission arrives it is best to treat this as a WP:FAIRUSE image rather than a free one. This means don't use it in any non-article page. Nobody is going to get mad at you if the permission arrives within a week or two, but after a month things will get dicey. You may have to change the permission to "fair use" and replace the image with a lower-quality image. If there is no actual article by the time that happens you may have to let the image be deleted then after the article exists, re-upload a low-quality version as a "fair use" image. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 14:34, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On wiki Davidwr[edit]

Hi Davidwr, apologies for not keeping the discussion on wiki, I'm still new at this. Appreciate your advice and comments. Cheers and have a great week ahead. Blitzio (talk) 08:22, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Playware Studios, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 16:11, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome Blitzio!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 47,530,623 users!

Hello, Blitzio. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions! I'm Nathan2055, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:

Introduction to Wikipedia

The five pillars of Wikipedia

Editing tutorial

How to edit a page

Simplified Manual of Style

The basics of Wikicode

How to develop an article

How to create an article

Help pages

What Wikipedia is not

Some common sense Do's and Don'ts:

Do be bold

Do assume good faith

Do be civil

Do keep cool!

Do maintain a neutral point of view

Don't spam

Don't infringe copyright

Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest

Don't vandalize

Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:

Ask a question

or even:

Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:

Fight vandalism

Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome

Help contribute to articles

Perform maintenance tasks

Become a member of a project that interests you

Help design new templates

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own private sandbox for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Sincerely, Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 16:11, 17 June 2013 (UTC) (Leave me a message)[reply]

Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 16:11, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Blitzio. You have new messages at Talk:Playware_Studios.
Message added 16:21, 17 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

QuantifiedElf (talk) 16:21, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ayondo (September 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a well disguised advert. Many of the references are regurgitated press releases and PR material. This is WP:BOMBARD If it can be rescued, so be it, but adverts have no place on Wikipedia.

Find good references, discard those that do not fit, and rewrite this from the bottom up based up what the references say.

We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ayondo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 15:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Blitzio, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 15:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In response to Articles for creation: Ayondo (September 1) rejection by Timtrent[edit]

@Timtrent: I understand, thanks for the constructive feedback and guidance on where I went wrong with this. I'm still learning and this would be the second Wikipedia article I'm attempting to work on. After reading your comment, I think I have a better idea as to what can be improved on the article. I'll go back and ensure it doesn't comprise regurgitated press releases. It wasn't my intention to create an advert. I'll ensure I put together a more notable and independent published sources and ensure the article comes out with a more encyclopedic tone rather than something that resembles PR/marketing material. Blitzio (talk) 15:56, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What I suggest is that you start by researching references. Gather them together and see what they say. Turn what they say into facts that are cited by the reference, and create fair, continuous prose around the bare facts. You may need to start for the bottom up.

There is no need to attempt to make the article everything you feel it should be. You only need enough to get it accepted. So you need to demonstrate its passing WP:GNG, and use references to verify that. Fiddle Faddle 16:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

What is your connection with ayondo? Do you have a conflict of interest that should be declared? Robert McClenon (talk) 06:38, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Robert McClenon: thanks for getting in touch. I am disclosing to you that I am an employee of ayondo and would therefore fall under connected contributor. As per the guidelines of Wikipedia, I have since updated my User page to declare this, and the article Talk page as well to ensure transparency and full disclosure. Thanks for your understanding. Blitzio (talk) 12:19, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again @Robert McClenon: please may I request for you to take a look at the information I've provided, such as my declarations as per the wiki guidelines and if you could consider removing the maintenance template if possible. Thanks for your consideration. Blitzio (talk) 09:22, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Blitzio - The maintenance template says that a conflict of interest editor contributed. That is true. I do not plan to review the article in depth to verify that it is neutral and so do not plan to remove the template. Please do not be in too much of a hurry to get the template removed, or you will annoy the volunteer editors. I will ask for advice about where you may ask for removal of the template, but just wait. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:25, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Robert McClenon - Ok understood, thanks for clarifying, I'll sit tight, appreciate your efforts. Blitzio (talk) 16:45, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ayondo for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ayondo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayondo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light2021 (talk) 17:52, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One account[edit]

Please be aware that you are to use only one account. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:32, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]