Jump to content

User talk:BlonddudeGoneDark

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Warnings[edit]

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been deleted, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

February 2008[edit]

  1. Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Jacqui McQueen. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Please do not add incorrect middle names to Hollyoaks character pages. ~~ [Jam][talk] 22:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Roger Kiddle, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:01, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Kieron Hobbs. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please do not include any kind of rumours or speculation on Wikipedia - see WP:CRYSTAL. ~~ [Jam][talk] 18:35, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4. This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Justin Burton. · AndonicO Hail! 21:11, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. ~~ [Jam][talk] 22:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  6. This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
    If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Zoe Carpenter, you will be blocked from editing. Please do not add spoilers to Wikipedia pages. If you continue to do this, you will be blocked. You have been warned before. ~~ [Jam][talk] 15:53, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  7. I have nominated Lulu Popplewell, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lulu Popplewell. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. αѕєηιηє t/c 13:26, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008[edit]

  1. This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
    If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lulu Popplewell, you will be blocked from editing. Jfire (talk) 16:51, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kralizec! (talk) 18:45, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lulu Popplewell, you will be blocked for vandalism. Jfire (talk) 16:16, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
    The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Jasmine 'Jazz' Summers, you will be blocked from editing. Jfire (talk) 16:17, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kralizec! (talk) 17:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  1. The community's patience is not unlimited. I would strongly encourage you to stop your disruptive editing after this latest block expires. Should you choose to continue down this path, your next block will no doubt be permanent. --Kralizec! (talk) 18:01, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. You are heading towards another block - stop creating unnecessary pages, removing content from the minor characters page and performing other unnecessary edits. ~~ [Jam][talk] 20:51, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008[edit]

  1. Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Amy Barnes. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~~ [Jam][talk] 19:17, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Maddie Hay-Barnes. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mifter (talk) 19:28, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
    The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Maddie Hay-Barnes, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mifter (talk) 19:29, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4. This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
    The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Josh Ashworth, you will be blocked from editing. ~~ [Jam][talk] 17:32, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/BlonddudeGoneDark for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Roleplayer (talk) 20:59, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked 48 hours, see case. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:06, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Typo redirect Father Kieron Hobbs[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Father Kieron Hobbs, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Father Kieron Hobbs is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Father Kieron Hobbs, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:30, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Kezzy Kurt[edit]

A tag has been placed on Kezzy Kurt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ~~ [Jam][talk] 19:18, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Maddie Hay-Barnes[edit]

I have nominated Maddie Hay-Barnes, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maddie Hay-Barnes. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ukexpat (talk) 19:27, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kezzy Kurt[edit]

I have nominated Kezzy Kurt, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kezzy Kurt. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ~~ [Jam][talk] 19:45, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Amelia Curtis[edit]

A tag has been placed on Amelia Curtis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Templarion1 (talk) 13:31, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Neville Ashworth, you will be blocked from editing. ~~ [Jam][talk] 19:33, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Samiyah Amanquah[edit]

I have nominated Samiyah Amanquah, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samiyah Amanquah. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 10:05, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Katie Angelou[edit]

The article Katie Angelou has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Another child actress failing our basic criteria for Notability, barely any real sources, nothing meaningful on google either and the article is less than satisfactory.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stemoc 02:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:BlonddudeGoneDark&oldid=1085720537"