User talk:Blondeignore

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Blondeignore, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kim D. Petersen (talk) 17:19, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 15:20, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

fine Ronz fine , I stand corrected...- BlondeIgnore Blondeignore (talk) 15:21, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy[edit]

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy‎ worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Viriditas (talk) 13:28, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not misuse talk pages by repeatedly posting off-topic material, especially when the same material has repeatedly been removed as off-topic. -- ChrisO (talk) 21:26, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

````[[ some of you so-called editors at this real climate ally wikipedia site truly disgust me...you are all playing a game as to who is clever and who is not but mainly your aim is to tell only liberl views about any topic or serious political issue. and it is clearly seen in how often people submit comments questioning this wiki site and all these censor kings...who do you people think you are ? - BlondeIgnore ````

Please stop posting the same rant over and over again on article talk pages. This is disruptive and not conducive to improving the content of articles. -- ChrisO (talk) 17:46, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please be advised that there is a general probation covering all climate change articles and discussions, broadly construed, and measures may be taken if you continue to post those rants. NW (Talk) 19:10, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moon landing conspiracy theories[edit]

Just read your rant on the talk page. Boy you are a whack job ain't ya? Even quibbling over the patently obvious photographic evidence. Jeez, as noted by Penn & Teller, if this was all Bullshit then someone among the 400,000 people working on the s0-called hoax someone/anyone would have blabbed by now. Just look at Watergate; your republican hero Nixon didn't last long as everyone had a tale to tell! 86.168.59.157 (talk) 11:52, 2 August 2012 (UTC) yes you sure showed me... and where are the MOON BASES ? haha Blondeignore (talk) 01:51, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Göbekli Tepe, you may be blocked from editing. and other pages. There is no such thing as "Wiki talk" and article talk pages are not there for discussing the subject of the article. Dougweller (talk) 09:12, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

i remember doug weller from the 1990s in the older message board sites...but my work or additions are important for

human society to see and attempts to undermine my work will be seen as aiding illegal coverups of information...by a ruling elite in power.Blondeignore (talk) 18:56, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you ever get properly medicated?

February 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm HickoryOughtShirt?4. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Homeland (TV series) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 06:37, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 2001:8003:34A3:800:4429:48C1:37E8:1992 (talk) 06:48, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]