User talk:BlueCheerfan

March 2017[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Blue Cheer has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Blue Cheer was changed by BlueCheerfan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.87873 on 2017-03-28T04:06:46+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:06, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Demo (music) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Demo (music) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPrC7LPxb-8) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:57, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:12, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Blue Cheer. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Meters (talk) 23:20, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Blue Cheer. - Mlpearc (open channel) 23:50, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Blue Cheer shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You still have not provide a reliable source for any of this material. Meters (talk) 17:15, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have broken 3RR on this. I suggest that you self revert and discuss this on the article's talk page. Meters (talk) 17:43, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your posts[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:Blue Cheer, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. - Mlpearc (open channel) 17:58, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:34, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Meters. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Don't remove my response, especially from my own page. Meters (talk) 20:51, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of rap rock bands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Body Count (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018[edit]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Lungs (album), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. snapsnap ^(talk) 06:26, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop making unsourced edits to genres. ~SML • TP 00:15, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have something to show you and here is proof on something. Please answer me as soon as you can so I know you got this.[edit]

I made this list with all the best Rock music artists and it have information on it of other Rock subgenres. https://www.thetoptens.com/a/#67093 Here is the list in a video too. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHoQSBLoF-E&feature=youtu.be It talks about all the Rock subgenres, how these are all the Rock subgenres and types of Rock music while the others are not real ones for like not having enough artists for it or that the artists are like other Rock artists from other types of Rock music. I know about all the Rock subgenres and I really study it. I made the list and really work on it so I can let people know about the other types of Rock music and what I like. I wanted to fix this website and put down the right information. I need you to look at it and even the other people who owns the website or the main people who works on it so I can show proof how these type of artists are this type of Rock music. There is facts and proof in music since you can show things to show proof. People even said before on something that it looks like this when it is not without knowing much about it. If you people do not look on it than I can never edit on this wiki of music since you would not look on my proof on what this type of music is.

Artists like Florence and the Machine and The 1975 are not part Rock artists since they sound like other Pop artists like Michael Jackson, Prince, Madonna and Adele. Florence and the Machine is to soft and poppy like Adele is but is just more harder like other Pop artists can get. Stina Nordenstam is a Rock artist and not Pop since other Alternative rock artists can be softer. Other Rock artists like Neil Diamond, Carole King, Tiny Tim, Cat Stevens, James Taylor and Joni Mitchell can be part Rock though. If Florence and the Machine is not a Rock artist than The 1975 is not too since The 1975 does not sound like the other Alternative pop artists just like Florence and the Machine does not. Alternative pop came out around the late 2000s. Grunge artists like Pearl Jam and Nirvana sound at the most as much as Heavy metal as Led Zeppelin and Deep Purple. Led Zeppelin and Deep Puple are more Heavy metal. People just say the are heavy metal since it is right before heavy metal and heavy metal came from Hard rock. It is like just a saying. There are people who say that deep down know Hard rock artists like those are not true Heavy metal. If they are all these opinons in music than I can think Country music is a fusion genre of Folk and Jazz and not a genre but Fusion genre.

When can I change things without going to a talk page just in case I do a lot of changing? Other people did before without changing it and even me without getting a warning by being blocked. When there is no information on something on it for what it is, is that is a time I can just change it as long as I do not just keep changing it back and forth with someone? BlueCheerfan (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2018 (UTC)BlueCheerFan[reply]

That’s original research, which is not accepted in Wikipedia, you need reliable sources. I understand some aspects of you rationale, but you cannot change it, your account is older than me by atleast 9 months, you should that you cannot change it. If you study rock music (which is amazing, I do too) you should keep your opinions and findings to yourself, such as I do. And also respect the opinions of others, but really you need to be bold (as long as it’s added with reliable sources), if you get your edit(s) reverted, you need to discuss on the talk page, which the discussions can last from 5 hours to a month, and if the majority of uses involved in the dialog agree with you, then you have every right to add it, as long as you follow the process of being bold, and if you get reverted, discuss on talk page. Sorry but you need to learn if you want to be here. Oh, and a fusion genre is technically a subgenre of two or more genres (such as saying “Grindcore is a subgenre of heavy metal and hardcore punk” is technically correct, as well as saying “Deathgrind is a style of grindcore and death metal”. You cannot change grunge, I happen to agree with the reliable AllMusic source that grunge is a fusion genre of alternative rock, punk rock, and heavy metal. But the message is that statement does not matter to Wikipedia, if you want to publish you ideas in another website, there’s nothing stopping you, it’s just that Wikipedia is different from other user generated websites, it needs sources to almost everything. Oh, and just for future reference, YouTube, and TheTopTens are not reliable sources because they’re user genrated, and being unsourced makes them more unreliable. But if you find reliable souces for your opinions, then go ahead, add them, but until then, don’t edit things you know will be controversial, especially in genres, that carries a bigger penalty. I hope you take this at heart and change your ways in Wikipedia for the greater good. Blue Cheers :) ~SML • TP 19:54, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How were you able to go to my account, give me warnings and can block people than if my account if really older than yours? Did you get a job at working on wiki? How were you able to and do this stuff on wiki when you were not one of the people that first build wiki? I know TheTopTens and YouTube (at least not always) are not reliable sources. I used them since that is where I post my list at. What about Watch Mojo and other history YouTube channels? How come those cannot be used but other websites that are not big names can be used? I know a fusion genre is technically a subgenre. I was just talking about regular subgenres and subgenres. I was just trying to explain something.

Ok fine. I do not need to keep changing stuff on wiki. I do not need to go and try to find proof for stuff since doing it can take a real while. There is so much stuff on wiki and that there is just a lot of spelling errors. I will just change something on the Blue Cheer page and talk about it under the talk page.BlueCheerfan (talk) 16:31, 13 August 2018 (UTC)BlueCheerFan[reply]

I really need you to answer me back and even on the post I post under the Blue Cheer talk page. Please answer me right away so I know you got this.BlueCheerfan (talk) 17:53, 21 August 2018 (UTC)BlueCheerFan[reply]

Please stop adding these pleas for people to answer you right away. I've already told you that Wikipedia does not work that way. We are all volunteers, and it it is up to us when we reply, or if we choose to reply at all. For that matter, you are expecting User:Sixty Minute Limit to still be watching a user talk page thread from more than 3 weeks ago, and to be interested in replying to your ridiculous questions about how Wikipedia works. (No the other user is not a Wikipedia employee, blocking has nothing to do with how long a user has been on Wikipedia, giving warnings has nothing to do with how old an account is, and being able to edit articles is not dependent on being one of earliest Wikipedia's editors or even on being one of the editors to have created an particular article.) I've answered your post on the article talk page by telling you to read the above links (WP:OR and WP:RS).Being able to verify content with reliable sources is a fundamental requirement. If you don't understand this then you probably should not be editing. Meters (talk) 19:00, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes BlueCheerfan, a lot of your actions are original reasearch, such is not permitted. Please stop, you’re actions are just damaging Wikipedia. ~SML • TP 19:08, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Saying that Blue Cheer 7 is not a studio album but a compilation album is also original research since there is no proof at all that it is a compilation album. Saying it is a compilation album is like saying any other Blue Cheer studio album is a compilation album instead. Knowing that Ralph Burns Kellogg is only on the first track off the album Outsideinside is not just original research since you can hear it for proof. It does not say anywhere that Ralph Burns Kellogg plays the other instruments. Knowing that is less original research than showing what other websites says since other websites can say the wrong things too. Proof is always better than great guesses or mostly the right answers since you can see it/here it. It is not like I am saying what type of subgenre something is. People left stuff on wiki before on what something is without leaving links like what something obvious is like I did before. There is a huge difference between Country and Thrash metal or a human and a dinosaur. So, are you going to say I still cannot make those two changes on the Blue Cheer wiki? I was not expecting you to keep watching the page. I thought you would get something that says you got a letter like I do. If you did not, than how did you saw my reply? A lot of times I say please answer since I really need answers for like editing and some of the stuff for the rules can be hard to understand. The is the only thing I need answer to know about working/editing on wiki.BlueCheerfan (talk) 22:05, 21 August 2018 (UTC)BlueCheerFan[reply]

Could you provide a reliable sources? I’m guessing a no. So please don’t do such edits. ~SML • TP 22:41, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I understand. Looks like there is no need for me to edit/post on wiki anymore then. I have nothing else to do on wiki. I found it funny that on the Blue Cheer album Highlights and Lowlives page before it had Roadhouse Blues as a outtake when there was no reliable source that it was. How do you become a volunteer on wiki? How did one other person know on the Blue Cheer wiki that you reply to me? How can someone look on wiki's user talk page?BlueCheerfan (talk) 15:16, 22 August 2018 (UTC)BlueCheerFan[reply]

By following the rules.. ~SML • TP 15:18, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, BlueCheerfan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]