User talk:Bob Castle/archive5

Userpage | Talk page | Talk page archives 1, 2, 3, 4 | Sandbox | New comment

For messages from 15/1/06 to 30/7/06, see my first talkpage archive.
For messages from 31/7/06 to 21/12/06, see my second talkpage archive.
For messages from 31/12/06 to 4/5/07, see my third talkpage archive.
For messages from 13/05/07 to 15/9/07, see my fourth talkpage archive.

WikiProject BBC[edit]

Comment

You have been placed on the Inactive members list. If you would like to continue contributing to the project, please move your name back onto the active members list here. Thank You, Tiddly-Tom 17:25, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Curtis[edit]

Hi Bob, I agree with all that you said but just to cover myself I've initiated a discussion at Wikipedia:Requested moves and Talk:Richard Curtis (screenwriter). Looking at the politician's article, he is involved in a recent sex scandal which probably explains the sudden move! Regards, Tim! 17:43, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cathedrals[edit]

Thank you very much, Bob! I'm glad you enjoyed it! I'm still tidying up a bit. Amandajm (talk) 12:21, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GAN[edit]

Thanks for nominating this article to GAN. I've left a status update at the Good Article nomination page, but won't be able to leave comments on the talk page for at least another two hours. Thank you for your nomination. Regards, Rudget.talk 16:05, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've now reviewed the article you nominated, and it has passed. Good nomination! If you want to help out further with the article, I've left some suggestions on the talk page to help. Regards, Rudget.talk 17:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blackadder Goes Forth GA sweep (hold)[edit]

I have reassessed this article as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. We are currently revisiting all listed Good articles in an effort to ensure that they continue to meet the Good article criteria.

In reviewing the article, I came across some issues that may need to be addressed; I have left a detailed summary on the article's talk page. As a result I have put Blackadder Goes Forth's GA status on hold. This will remain in place for a week or so before a final decision is taken as to the article's status.

I've left this notice here because, from the article history, you have been a significant contributor. If you no longer edit this article, please accept my apologies and feel free to disregard this message.

Regards, EyeSerene^TALK 11:49, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About one foot in the grave[edit]

They just came out with a new all episodes and the christmas special, with new commentary and that has not been update on the page. I would like to see information on if the new dvd has subtitles, because while the other single seasons do have that information, this information is a black hole. It might be worth it for non english speakers to know this information or for the deaf. Or if I could buy the european release, they always have four languages and subtitles, but they don't make a european release.Robert551 (talk) 02:20, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I found a site on the subject on dvd subtitles[edit]

http://dvd-subtitles.com/

I found this site, but even here they are not telling, so I was looking to get in touch with some super fans of one foot in the grave who may know, but I couldn't find any. I also noticed the DVD release information is out of date, but I don't know how to send an alert to let the people who maintain the one foot in the grave page, so they can update it. So, I left you a message. I don't have the dvd either yet, so I don't feel qualified to update it myself. Maybe there is a kind of "to do list" for the page, but I can't find it. Robert551 (talk) 18:53, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bells (Blackadder)[edit]

Your google link [1] does not work - at least not for me. --Jack Merridew 15:22, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if it's still in the original page that google were caching.--Alf ^melmac 15:56, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Centralized TV Episode Discussion[edit]

Over the past months, TV episodes have been reverted by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here [2]. --Maniwar (talk) 20:06, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BBC UK regional TV on satellite[edit]

Moved as requested, regards. Tim! (talk) 18:10, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dad's Army on hold (GA sweep)[edit]

Hello again!

I have reassessed the above article as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. We are currently revisiting all listed Good articles in an effort to ensure that they continue to meet the Good article criteria.

In reviewing the article, I came across some issues that may need to be addressed; I have left a detailed summary on the article's talk page. As a result I have put Dad's Army's GA status on hold. This will remain in place for a week or so before a final decision is taken as to the article's status.

I've left this notice here because, from the article history, you have been a significant contributor. If you no longer edit this article, please accept my apologies and feel free to disregard this message ;)

Regards, EyeSerene^TALK 10:32, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

On 1 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Paul's walk, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congrats! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 06:00, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Uncle Max[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Uncle Max, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncle Max. Thank you. Porcupine (prickle me! · contribs · status) 07:50, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar award for your work you earnt it[edit]

		The Original Barnstar
		For the sourcing/referencing and general editing of the article The Last Enemy in a timely matter when the article was under scrutiny from an AfD. Sin Harvest (talk) 02:39, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

tvark[edit]

I believe the edit was vandalism. It sure looked like it. Malpass93 (talk) 16:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Zealand Postcards[edit]

Why did you remove my link from this page as spam, when it is no different than the othe 3 other links in the external links section. they all promote sale of their postcards, where my one only has images of New Zealand Post Cards? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spaceman8815 (talk • contribs) 05:24, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re GA sweeps[edit]

I've noticed you're involved in many of the articles I'm sweeping on behalf of WP:GAPQ/S. The work you've been putting in is much appreciated - all the more so since I'm well aware that these GA reassessments are unsolicited. It's likely that there will be more to come (the next article on my list is One Foot in the Grave, which on initial read-through suffers from the same issues as Mr. Bean), but I'll delay further assessment until the Mr. Bean hold expires.

What I'd like to avoid is creating the sense that I'm landing an unwelcome and unfair workload on a few editors, such as yourself, leading to improper article delisting. At the same time I'm sure you understand that articles rated as 'GA' need to comply with current criteria. To that end, is there anything I can do to make this process easier? Perhaps extending the 'hold' periods, or advertising the reassessment more widely? If you have any suggestions, please get in touch! All the best, EyeSerene^talk 18:14, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can't help with Mr Bean, but I'll certainly give you a hand with One Foot... The JPS ^{talk to me} 13:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback - I'm relieved you see it that way! Unfortunately GA sweeping can be an excellent way to upset valuable editors, and I really feel bad about delisting articles that have been worked on so hard... especially if it's the same editors involved each time. However, I won't delist an article that's actively being worked on (even if the hold has technically expired), so there's no need to rush. All the best, EyeSerene^talk 10:38, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gateshead millenium bridge[edit]

It was not none sence it is true I and my Father were the first non construction men to walk on the bridge I have the photographs to prove it and I am happy to add them to the article. DO NOT ACCUSE ME OF BEING A LIAR OR A VANDAl. I LOOK FORWARD TO RECIEVING YOUR APPOLOGY.

Yours faithfully Steven Spall. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevenspallrocks (talk • contribs) 23:09, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nom[edit]

On 28 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Curse of Steptoe, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Gatoclass (talk) 04:58, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kings (TV series)[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Kings (TV series), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kings (TV series). Thank you. B. Wolterding (talk) 19:43, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.