User talk:Bobbyc3aop

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2011[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Tuality Healthcare. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Aboutmovies (talk) 06:49, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not using the edit summary. The logo used on your unofficial Tuality Healthcare page is a trademarked image and NOT in the free domain (obviously taken without permission from an old website). As a representative of Tuality Healthcare, I cannot allow the logo to be used here. Bobbyc3aop (talk) 07:12, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You'll note the logo is being used with a proper fair use rationale statement. You can read more about fair use on Wikipedia at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline. Further, I'd strongly recommend reading Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy and Wikipedia's policy regarding legal threats. tedder (talk) 09:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please review Wikipedia:NFCC Policy-section 10: criteria has not been met in this instance.Bobbyc3aop (talk) 19:16, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Really? What part of 10? a. is meet as the logo owner is identified "... each division of Tuality Healthcare (the logo owner)". b. is met as the copyright tag is that big thing near the bottom that is hard to miss under the "licensing" section. c. is meet by there being links to all three pages the logo was being used on. Note though that your new image is actually the one that falls part c., as the logo is used on three articles but there is only a single rationale and link.
It appears you are involved with Tuality, and frankly, you just made an enemy by being a dick with your edits. You want to replace the logo with something newer, fine. Communicate that, don't go trying to claim that an IP attorney who actually knows what he is doing is violated a copyright. So happy editing, and good luck as your organization's PR skills appear to be really good. Aboutmovies (talk) 03:26, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]