User talk:Bobulous

Here are some tips to help you get started:

If you haven't already, please add your name to the new user log to let others know a little about yourself.
Read the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the Sandbox.
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.
To sign your name on a talk page, please finish your comments with ~~~~ (four tildes). The wiki will insert a link to your userpage and the timestamp.
Not every subject needs its own page. Sometimes it is wiser to deal with certain subjects together on one page. See Wikipedia:Merge and Wikipedia:Redirect for some background. You may want to review Avoiding common mistakes to get started quickly.
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck! JFW | T@lk 17:39, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 70 St Mary Axe has been accepted[edit]

70 St Mary Axe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 18:14, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Bobulous

Thank you for creating 70 St Mary Axe.

User:Cwmhiraeth, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

An interesting article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cwmhiraeth}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 15:16, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your reversion of my edit to V Festival[edit]

Would you look again please? I did not remove any content. --Monxton (talk)

Ah, apologies: part of the diff view disappeared over the page fold and tricked me into thinking you had replaced the old paragraph with the new.

Also, I wasn't sure that a general vendor site would be considered a reliable source, but WP:RS does actually name vendor sites as being acceptable, even though other types of source are preferable.

One thing I don't understand, though: you've marked the change as minor, but it's clearly not minor according to WP:ME. Changes should only be marked as minor if they involve typographical corrections or style formatting adjustments. Any change which adds new information to a page should definitely be considered non-minor.

If you reinstate the change, and don't mark it as minor, then I'll keep my hands off it this time. --Bob (talk) 20:43, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Canon EOS R[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Canon EOS R you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 22:24, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Canon EOS R[edit]

The article Canon EOS R you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Canon EOS R and Talk:Canon EOS R/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 12:17, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Canon EOS R[edit]

The article Canon EOS R you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Canon EOS R for comments about the article, and Talk:Canon EOS R/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 20:41, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]