User talk:Boeing329

Boeing329

This user wishes He was back in Greece
But this in no way affects Boeing329's ability to respond. He just wants everyone to know.
1

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Boeing329, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Arabic Empire, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

Your first article
Contributing to Wikipedia
Biographies of living person File:ExemplumJPEGis.jpg JPEGis.jpg
How to write a great article
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Help pages
Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page.

         Again, welcome! Bilingual2000 (talk) 11:03, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arabic Empire[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Arabic Empire, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

Again, welcome! Bilingual2000 (talk) 11:03, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the {{help me}} template appropriately.
The {{help me}} template is for help in using Wikipedia, not for unrelated issues. If you would like to ask such a question, replace the code {{help me-inappropriate}} on this page with {{help me}} to reactivate the help request. Alternatively, you can also ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance.

How can i vote for the elections

Boeing329 Unfortunately that is not something Wikipedia can assist with. Please use the help-me function for Wikipedia related matters. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:05, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

However, if you are talking about the Wikimedia board of trustees election, see the Meta page about it. You should check if you are eligible to vote here.

Seagull123 Φ 13:08, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi Boeing329! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

Illustrator

-- 12:53, Monday, May 1, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Hi. Like I said My Name Is Delyan.  My Hobbie is Reading. Write Comments Below.
                                                                                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           Hello! Leave Any Comments Here. 22:02, Monday, May 1 2017

Speedy deletion nomination of Arabic Empire[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Arabic Empire requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.historyworld.net/wrldhis/PlainTextHistories.asp?ParagraphID=ebw#ixzz4fwFtcZ3L. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:03, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments Bit[edit]

<--Please Write Your Comments Below-->

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Boeing329, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Murph9000 (talk) 04:21, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes[edit]

Hi there. This is just friendly feedback and advice, you've not broken any rules or anything like that. I noticed that you have many userboxes per language on your user page. That's not how they are normally used. Typically people just use a single userbox per language, for the highest level of skill they have in that language. I'm just offering this advice to help you avoid presenting an unusual or confusing appearance to the community. Happy editing. Murph9000 (talk) 04:26, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Exuse Me[edit]

Moved from User talk:Murph9000

Exuse me, Can I Talk To You? Leave Your Answer On My Talk Page Please. Boeing329 (talk) 16:18, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sure. Mostly you can just go ahead and talk to other editors, it saves the initial back and forth.

What would you like to ask? Note, you can just have the conversation here, by "pinging" me, e.g. {{Reply to|Murph9000}} Your message here. ~~~~ Murph9000 (talk) 15:23, 3 May 2017

Final warning--[edit]

If you again edit a user talk page or user page in a disruptive manner, you may be blocked from editing. I specifically mean for you to leave User talk:Chrissymad alone. Thanks ‎ Dloh cierekim 16:35, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boeing329 is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia on May 4,19:50 GMT.

May 2017[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events. bonadea contributions talk 18:02, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 72 hours[edit]

I don't know what is happening with/to you, but to prevent further disruption, I'm going to block you in hopes that on your return you can edit more constructively. Dloh cierekim 18:54, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: BabelBoxes[edit]

Just a comment, but you may want to remove all the lower boxes: ie, If you speak En4, ditch en1,2, and 3. This will help you communicate more clearly to others about your langauge skills. d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 00:27, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not a playground[edit]

Sorry, you're simply wasting too much of other people's time, and you don't seem to care. I've blocked you from editing indefinitely. The standard block template will be left below; unconstructive unblock requests will result in removal of talk page access. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:31, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Floquenbeam (talk) 20:31, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock: I Won't Do It Again

{{vacation}} (not yet start on 27 July)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Boeing329 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't mean to-It was A accident and sorry Boeing329 (talk) 16:17, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. You received multiple warnings and a previous block; it's tough to see how your edits wre a "mistake." only (talk) 16:57, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SEMI-AROUND

This user is active enough that "Semi-Retired" isn't really applicable, but he's not around all the time either...

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Boeing329 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I won't do it again because i will edit more carefully and not be rude to other people and be more friendly Boeing329 (talk) 17:10, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This wasn't a case of you editing without sufficient care. This was a case of you deliberately trolling. You need to convince us that you understand why your edits were inappropriate and convince us we can trust you never to make edits like that again. Yamla (talk) 17:18, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

July 2017[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Boeing329 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i know my edits have been disruptive recently and i'm wasting other people's time whitch is unkind. so if i have 1 chance i'll show i'll never do it again and i'm not that kind of person Boeing329 (talk) 17:12, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Insufficient answer to below question. I know of at least two other accounts you have created. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 22:18, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please tell us what other accounts you have created. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 17:54, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have created a alternitive account called 297BagMan.Boeing329 (talk) 19:47, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, continual inadequate unblock requests, fiddling with userboxes on talk page, becoming a serious timesink. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Floquenbeam (talk) 15:45, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

bruh Funneh bruh (talk) 23:03, 22 July 2020 (EEST)

UTRS 41160 is now open[edit]

UTRS appeal #41160 @Floquenbeam: Hope you are well. Back in 2017, you disabled this user's talk page because, damn. There are many issues that need careful consideration and that will require wiki links in the discussion. All things considered, I'd like to restore talk page access for better discussion and to assess user's readinenss to return. If I don't hear back in a day or two, I will go ahead so as to clear this request from my desk. Cheers, --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:34, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: Please feel free to do whatever you think is best. I have to admit this is from long enough ago that I don't recall any details. Plus, I don't have the OS goggles, so can't see what got their talk page revoked to refresh my memory. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:24, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: I just placed a CU block on User talk:Xxfortnitegamer123xX. Drmies (talk) 17:32, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: Thanks! rutroh! --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:44, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I cannot unblock you at this time. However, you may wish to make use of our "standard offer" <<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Standard_offer>> UTRS appeal #41160 is now closed.

. Wait at least six months without sockpuppetry. That means no editing the English Wikipedia, under this account or any other, or while not logged in, for six months.
. Constructively edit other WMF projects or other language Wikipedia's
. Request unblocking with a request that addresses the original reasons for your block.

Thank you. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:49, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #50613 declined. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 03:46, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I recognize that @Deepfriedokra: has extended the standard offer to you, however I am not convinced by your UTRS request. If Deepfriedokra or another admin thinks otherwise I have no objection to them granting your request. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 03:48, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]