User talk:Bolosphex

Welcome!

Hello, Bolosphex, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

- I'd also like to welcome you to Wikiproject Tree of Life. Happy Editing, Ryan shell (talk) 23:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Crabronini[edit]

We welcome articles like Crabronini and other similar insect articles you recently started. In addition to the infobox, would you please add at least some text that describes the creature to these articles. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style for some ideas on what an article should contain. Thanks, and good editing. Truthanado (talk) 02:49, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

a little cooperation, please?[edit]

Hi. While much of your recent editing is VERY welcome, a few things to consider are these: (1) please bear in mind what the taxonomic hierarchy being used here happens to be - if you wish to apply any alternative classifications, it might be best to discuss any changes before proceeding, and (2) please do not move pages that have common name titles to pages with scientific name titles, as you did for Eumeninae - the problem is that scientific names can change, while common names do not. Moves such as this go contrary to Wikipedia policy in naming conventions, and MUST be discussed prior to implementation.

As a minor technical point, it is generally NOT policy to place the authors of subdivision names within the taxobox, as you have done with Eumeninae and Synagris, for example. This makes the taxobox vastly longer than it needs to be - those author names should be used only in the taxobox of the article for the appropriate taxon (e.g., the author of the genus Abispa should only appear in the Abispa article, not the Eumenine article). No, I'm not saying you need to go back and remove those names you have already entered, but in the future save yourself all that extra work and keep the taxoboxes down to a more manageable size.

I've done over 5000 wikipedia edits, covering nearly every one of the insect-related pages, especially Hymenoptera, and I'll be happy to offer advice and guidance so our efforts work together, and not in conflict. Peace, Dyanega (talk) 18:03, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, regarding the size of the taxoboxes; while I realize that technically you are able to supply the names of all the species in a genus such as Zethus (I can do the same, as I have Jim Carpenter's complete world Vespid catalog in digital form), the simple fact is that no one - including yourself - is likely to ever make a Wikipedia article for every one of those species. As a rule of thumb, once a genus has more than ~20 species, it is more practical to simply state in the taxobox that there are >20 species, or >25, or whatever a reasonable approximation happens to be. In cases such as this, if you DO make actual species pages, then it is easy to go back and modify the genus page to contain a link to the species for which actual articles are present. Look at the Carpenter bee article, or Cerceris, for example - those articles would be unmanageably long if all of the known species were redlinked there! Yes, I have those species lists, and I could paste them into Wikipedia in a matter of seconds, but it would NOT be helpful to do so. Basically, a page which consists of little more than a giant list of permanently red links (such as the Zethus page) - while it is not against policy - could be done without listing every single species, which would make your job as an editor easier, without losing any real information that a reader might be interested in. It is possible to compromise on accuracy and still maintain utility, and doing so will allow you to create more pages, faster and more efficiently. Dyanega (talk) 18:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand and appreciate that as a new editor, and not a native English speaker, your initial efforts may not all conform to the standards, which is why I'm happy to offer advice on what those standards are. We're both professional hymenopteran taxonomists, and I'm definitely happy to have someone like you joining up with Wikipedia to help improve the quality of the insect articles! Allow me to offer a few more minor things, then: (1) try to avoid having wikilinked terms that link back to the page itself (for example, you had the name "Masaridae" wikilinked back to the pollen wasp page on which it appeared - this is called a "self-link" and should be avoided) (2) If there is only a single genus in a family/subfamily, or a single species in a genus, then the only article that should be created is the article for the lowest applicable taxonomic rank, and any higher ranks should be simple redirects to that lower-rank article. See, for example, the changes I made to the Euparagia article, as well as Heterogyna. Note that comment #1 above applies to the taxobox, as well - e.g., the name "Euparagiinae" should not be wikilinked on the Euparagia page, since it redirects back to itself). (3) Finally, the category assignments should not overlap; any member of the Apoidea (the sphecoid wasps) should list ONLY the category "Apoidea" at the bottom, and NOT the category "Wasps". The latter category already includes the Apoidea as a sub-category. Again, I'm trying to be helpful and make it so that you can focus more on the addition of content, and not worry as much about the format, without creating articles that require extensive cleanup. You'll see that I have done cleanups on a number of the articles you've created already, most of it minor, and mostly to make sure the articles are consistent in appearance and structure. Dyanega (talk) 21:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A question about Epipona[edit]

Bolivar - a colleague here has recently observed Epipona guerini extracting burrowing larvae from within avocado fruit; are you aware of any records for this or other Epiponines which involve this form of prey capture? Thanks, Dyanega (talk) 00:29, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

userbox relocation[edit]

Hi, just a heads-up that a userbox you have on your pages (interest in conspiracy theories) has changed location to User:Sappho'd/Userboxes/Conspiracybutnoreptoids

Cheers. Drywontonmee (talk) 07:04, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice[edit]

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 07:44, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congradulations![edit]

BLEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE... yay! You have won a NEW CAR!!! NOT, I'm sorry i couldn't help myself. WOW, you are more organized than any other Wikipedian i've destro.. I MEAN congradulated. You have won my daily (sometimes weekly) award of people who like astronomy! Well, hey it's better than some of the other things i've given.

>
> *Marie* (talk) 02:53, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You've been Invited![edit]

You have been invited to join WikiProject Insects!! Join today and work with me and other members (project just made 22:44, 19 November 2009 (UTC)) in a collaboration on improving insect orders and creating pages of insect families. Things like insect-related awards, userboxes, topicons, ect. are also coming soon.

You might also be interested in improving Hymenoptera (your interested in wasp) to GA status , just reply on my talk page when you ready!! Bugboy52.4 | =-= 23:09, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your view sought[edit]

As a member of WP Arthropods, you might have a view on this discussion. Thanks in advance. Heds (talk) 03:53, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ischnogasteroides[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ischnogasteroides, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://zipcodezoo.com/Key/Animalia/Eumenidae_Family.asp.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:28, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Paravespa[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Paravespa, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://zipcodezoo.com/Key/Animalia/Eumenidae_Family.asp.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:45, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Science lovers wanted![edit]

Science lovers wanted!

Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 18:47, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SIA project![edit]

Hey Bolosphex! So happy that you came by the Smithsonian Institution Archives project and signed up to participate! We've got a great list of subjects that need to be improved upon or written about. I do hope you'll visit the to-do list and dive in - do let me know if you need anything. And of course, your contributions can earn you the official oh so fancy SIA barnstar :) Thanks again! So happy to have you on board! SarahStierch (talk) 23:05, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zetheumenidion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cameron (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pterocheilus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kohl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:37, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Bolosphex. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Symmorphoides[edit]

Proposed deletion of Symmorphoides[edit]

The article Symmorphoides has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

this genus has no species in it according to GBIF and insectoid.info

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Quetzal1964 10:56, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!