User talk:Bomber7600

Welcome!

Hello, Bomber7600, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 02:13, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

Unless you can calm down you’ll be listed here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

• Actually, a matter concerning you is under discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Bomber7600  Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:00, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Hello, I'm Dlohcierekim. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.   Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:43, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Edit-warring

Let me make it clear to you that Wikipedia is a serious enterprise to construct an encyclopedia, and not a battleground. You must not attempt to force the version of an article that you prefer by continual reversion, because that is edit-warring. You need to learn to concentrate on the edits and not the editor. Surely you must realise that you cannot resolve disagreements about content by reverting. Edit-warring is not the solution and you must engage on the talk page. That way you stand a chance of attracting other interested editors who can offer their opinion until a consensus develops. The three talk pages Talk:List of 20th Century Fox films (2000–present), Talk:List of Walt Disney Pictures films and Talk:The King's Man exist to allow you to make your case about the disputed content of the article. In this case, where there is a dispute over whether Entertainment Weekly and Walt Disney Studios are reliable sources for that content, we have a WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard, where you can ask other editors for their opinions on whether the source is reliable or not.

I hope you understand that other uninvolved administrators like Dlohcierekim are also concerned, and that administrators will not hesitate to take action should edit-warring continue. Please let's not see any recurrence. --RexxS (talk) 14:53, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

The king’s man source

Well Bomber7600 I hope this is war you just calling them stupid from Entertainment Weekly that is vandalism I’m trying to make things work but you don’t called them stupid for this company Anyway it’s War period. Ser-rod-7 (talk) 06:15, 19 July 2019 (UTC)