User talk:Boolyme

SEMI-RETIRED

This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Boolyme}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

This user is currently cleaning his computer mouse. Content on this page may change drastically during this session. Please consider not tagging with a vandalism warning unless the user has not edited in several days, the user has no nonsense at all or otherwise fails to meet our mouse cleaning criteria.
This page was last edited by MediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs) 5 months ago. (Update timer)

Your note[edit]

Hi there Boolyme, I would recommend talking to the admin who originally declined your request. I don't think it would be a good idea (for either of us) if I were to approve your request only three or four days after it was declined. Best. Acalamari 16:37, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It would depend: I noticed that vandalism and a block were mentioned as reasons for declining your request. If you do good work (edit articles!) for a week, maybe two, you may not even need to wait for a month before requesting again. Acalamari 16:49, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. :) Acalamari 18:54, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

Your addition to File:Patnaganges.jpg has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:18, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Template:Sandbox has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. Hazard-SJ ± 18:43, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer permission[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:49, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

S'alright.[edit]

The main reason I reverted the other guy is he messed up the file link. If it's copyvio as well, so be it. Sort of odd it'd be here for five years without someone grabbing it, but I suppose the place has an assload of pics, too. HalfShadow 21:25, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Patna[edit]

Hi. I'd agree that the article talk page is the best place to discuss topics, and will do so there. I'll see if I can find some advice on the best way to describe hotels restaurants etc in a more neutral way - this was the problem with the article as I saw it. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:02, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have chosen to place a WP:3RR template on my talk page, rather than discussing the issue properly, I will no longer be willing to discuss the edits until you can tell me whether the edits by IP 192.17.199.95 were also made by you - if so (as I suspect), it is clearly you that is edit-warring. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:08, 5 February 2011 (UTC) AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore that too: but I will be seeking advice on the article. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Patna Women's College; Subramanyam Bharti Award; Patna division; Mata Gujri; Ganga Sharan Singh Award; Nadwan, Patna; Jungle; A.N. Sinha Institute of Social Studies; Patna Film Festival; Pothuluri Veerabrahmam; Patna Museum; Sterling Knight; Dr. George Grierson Award; Sarvepalli Gopal; Kalika Mata Temple, Chittorgarh Fort; Patna College; Lallan Prasad Singh; Anusha Dandekar; Padmabhushan Dr. Moturi Satyanarayan Award

Cleanup: Indian honours system; Bangladesh Chhatra League; Arjuna Award
Merge: Krishak Praja Party; Kalika Temple; Maha Kali Mandir
Add Sources: Sikh Rehat Maryada; Antam Sanskar; Patna Dental College
Wikify: Syed Ibrahim; Mount Carmel High School, Patna; Electricity sector in Iraq
Expand: Anand Karaj; Bankipore; Trams in India

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:07, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sth about "Reliable source"[edit]

Hi there. As you told me that the source I provided for the article "Justin Bieber", is not a reliable, so I have few question going to ask you.

What is the definition of 'reliable source'?
The viewing count of a Youtube video is a actual fact, so how could the source I provided be unreliable?
Is that necessary to cite a source for any content? Andyso (talk) 12:47, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I clicked the wrong link. Sorry for the wrong warning message. I have undone my revert. Boolyme ^Chat!! 12:53, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

your reverts[edit]

why don't you work on improving the pages instead of just deleting and reverting all my edits, without any objective explanation? i suggest to work on improving wikipedia instead of wasting your time deleting others works--82.213.38.2 (talk) 14:21, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rahul Dravid[edit]

Hiya Boolyme, I saw that you have undid one of my edits on the Rahul Dravid article. I apologize if this is my fault, as I am new to reviewing, but the reason I rejected the revision of that article was to prevent an anonymous (IP) user from removing a piece of information that has been there throughout previous accepted revisions, and without an edit summary. If you have other thoughts on this, please feel free to let me know! Angelo ♫ 22:42, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Boolyme. You have new messages at Angelo Michael's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Rollback[edit]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I've granted you Rollback rights. Just remember:

Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

Wifione _.......^{Leave a message} 15:48, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on article[edit]

Thank you for reviewing and kind compliments. I have added the See Also section as you suggested and gone live. Basavanagudi Aquatic Centre. Should I remove the request for feedback now? I could not find any information regarding that. Nanda ramesh (talk) 06:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for removing the user draft tag. Added the category "Swimming venues in India". Nice feeling to get the first one out successfully! :) Nanda ramesh (talk) 10:06, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Dear Sir,

I would like to know as to why do you think my previous contribution to the Rahul Gandhi page was worthy of reversion. It was backed by strong factual citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parthpms (talk • contribs) 10:06, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can read WP:NPOV. Even though there have been many scandals, unless the exact knowledge comes in public domain, they can't be added as they are potentially libelous. Another thing is that you should discuss on talk page first if you are adding any information like this. Boolyme ^Chat!! 08:08, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is in the public domain, the only thing is that it is probably not widely publicized. Have a look at this link http://www.zeenews.com/news528156.html#

Warm Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parthpms (talk • contribs) 14:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article link which you gave talks about Rajiv Gandhi and not Rahul Gandhi. So, its unnecessary to include it in his page. Boolyme ^Chat!! 14:56, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Shree Betal temple[edit]

Hello Boolyme. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Shree Betal temple, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The subject of the article is a temple and is therefore not covered by CSD A7. Thank you. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 17:49, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know whats the CSD code for temple articles. The basic fact is there are a million temples in India. Shree Betal is one amongst them. Its neither a notable temple nor does the article signifies its importance. There's one link at Vetala which mentions its name. But again, no reference is given for that. It has to be deleted, although under a different tag. Boolyme ^Chat!! 17:58, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are no speedy deletion criteria that cover buildings (see WP:NOTCSD #7). If you believe that it does not meet notability requirements you are free to pursue other deletion venues. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 18:25, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Veena Malik[edit]

before telling anyone else you must learn the administration, and if you cant handle leave it, Wikipedia is managed by user and if someone make any correction, It is not necessary to show your administration there, in that pic Veena Malik is third from right, and 5th from left is Pakistani Film actress Resham. Zeesolz (talk) 13:17, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have the following points that you should note- 1.Have you ever bothered to think what is the use of Discussion Page?. 2. Do you know what References mean? Have you ever bothered to put them while editing wikipedia. 3. The person 3rd from right can be Veena Malik. If you would have been a little less preaching in your advice that you have given free of cost here, you wouldn't have received so many warning messages on your talk page. Boolyme बूलीमी ^{Chat बोलो!!} 15:12, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the rewrite of the image caption. I think it's much easier to count five people from the left than any number from the right given that on the right side of the image people aren't lined up.

I think this discussion would go smoother by following WP:NEWCOMER. --Ronz (talk) 17:41, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Lipstick lesbian[edit]

Hello Boolyme. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Lipstick lesbian, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. nancy 10:24, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Kunal majumder[edit]

Hello Boolyme, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kunal majumder, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: since you tagged it, enough has been added, in my view, to get it past A7. It still needs independent references: I will tag it accordingly and keep an eye. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 14:06, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

According to my knowledge of the Indian education system, Mr. Majumdar might be 23 years old now. He is working in Tehelka.com, an online news portal based in Delhi as a correspondent. Its his official duty to write reports. Now, as far as the references given in the article are concerned, 2 is from his website which he can edit at his own free will, 1 is the linkedin profile which even I have, 6 are from Tehelka.com which is his employer and rest 2 are other online sources which may have a tie-up with Tehelka.com. The facts i.e. Introduction, education and family are totally from his personal website. The page creation might have been done to improve the marketability of the Mr. Majumdar. Although I can't say this for sure.

Now, you tell me whether Wikipedia should carry a page of a 23-year old who has joined a company two years back and his journalistic contributions have not fetched any major third party references, awards or citations of any kind? Please reply. According to me, he doesn't have any credible claim of significance or importance. Boolyme बूलीमी ^{Chat बोलो!!} 14:52, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, we shouldn't. The question is whether there is enough "assertion of importance" to get him past A7, which is a much lower bar than "notability". In fact, now that I re-read it, I was probably wrong, misled by it being better wrtten than most NN bios - it doesn't, quite, even get over that bar. My apologies. However, I won't re-tag it now, I will watch for a few days and then PROD and if necessary AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 14:59, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's been PRODded by another editor, that will do. If anyone gives him a job on the basis of that article, with a "Notability" flag on top, they deserve what they get. And I don't agree with your giving him a #3 warning: we don't make people read the rules before they edit (I think we should, but that's another matter) so we shouldn't give them #3 warnings with threats of blocking until they have already had, and ignored, earlier warnings. Never mind, it's done, and the article will soon be gone. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 23:14, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

You appear to still be very active, is there a particular reason why you have the "retired" template at the top of your page? --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 19:22, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

naah. nothing in particular. am i violating any rules? Boolyme बूलीमी ^{Chat बोलो!!} 22:27, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The retired template is meant to communicate to others that you are no longer active on Wikipedia; if that's not the case you should not have a template that misleads others when they come here to communicate with you. If you simply plan on being around less than you had previously then the 'semi-retired' template is more appropriate. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 01:12, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Patna[edit]

Why are you unlinking everything? [1]??? —SpacemanSpiff 18:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop it! —SpacemanSpiff 18:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you have stopped, please revert yourself, you have removed valid links from about 130 articles. —SpacemanSpiff 18:59, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know what triggered unlinking. How to revert it? Boolyme बूलीमी ^{Chat बोलो!!} 19:00, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are a rollbacker, you can go to your contributions (link in my first post) and rollback all these edits. That's the simplest way to go about it. If you wait much longer then someone might make another edit and you'll have to go in and manually change/undo it. —SpacemanSpiff 19:04, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a tool by which I can rollback my previous 130 edits in one click? Otherwise, I will have to wake up whole night to do this :( :( Boolyme बूलीमी ^{Chat बोलो!!} 19:06, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's a user script, but there are restrictions on use, I'm not aware of the details or which users have it. —SpacemanSpiff 19:10, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Kenny Hawkes[edit]

Hello Boolyme. I declined the speedy you suggested for this article, as the subject appears likely to meet our notability guidelines. Thanks, Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:14, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Santosh Sharma for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Santosh Sharma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santosh Sharma until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. noq (talk) 20:27, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments on talk:RSS page.[edit]

Hi,

I have noticed that you have commented on the talk page.

Though I have pointed out several times, apparently there are no standards for the first line as it is. I think you will be shown a haze of standards, asked to go though it and then clarify everything what you say. At the end, there are many Reliable Sources to back allegations in the first line as well. Watch out, this is Wikipedia. ..असक्तः सततं कार्य कर्म समाचर | असक्तः हि आचरन् कर्म.. Humour Thisthat2011 10:02, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't have to be any bitter at all, leave it. Don't worry, be happy. Wikipedia is not made of concrete, nevermind whatever happens. ..ईती ईती नॆती नॆती.. Humour Thisthat2011 17:07, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Boolyme. You have new messages at MikeLynch's talk page.
Message added 20:24, 31 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Lynch 7 20:24, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stop your nonsense. and get a job. Boolyme बूलीमी ^{Chat बोलो!!} 20:26, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to WikiConference India 2011[edit]

Hi Boolyme,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

Survey for new page patrollers[edit]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Boolyme! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:51, 25 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Nomination of Next What's In for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Next What's In is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next What's In (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 04:41, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Santosh Sharma for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Santosh Sharma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santosh Sharma (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 04:44, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2012 Contest[edit]

Hello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require assessment, that is, the addition of a WikiProject template to the talk page of an article, assessing it for quality and importance and adding a few extra parameters to it.

As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a Tag & Assess 2012 drive-cum-contest has begun from March 01, 2012 to last till May 31, 2012.

If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from Part One of the Assessment Guide. Part Two of the Guide will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so.

You can sign up on the Tag & Assess page. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way.

ssriram_mt (talk) & AshLin (talk) (Drive coordinators)

Delivered per request on Wikipedia:Bot requests. 01:10, 12 March 2012 (UTC) The Helpful Bot 01:10, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Nupur Mehta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Imagine Dragons (EP)[edit]

Just a heads-up that I reverted you here. That template's kind of a tricky one but my interpretation is that it'd be appropriate for an article full of sourced content, which nonetheless only had a single source. This particular article's different, in that it's full of unsourced content, and the fact that it only has a single source is due to it having only the one sourced statement (so {{refimprove}} and/or lots of {{fact}} tags is a better way to point out the problem). I'm aware I might be overcomplicating things though, and so was wondering your opinion? – hysteria18 (talk) 01:17, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Debate participation[edit]

Please participate in this debate (Talk:Afghanistan#Pls_add_the_footnote). We need more opinions from people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.212.88.26 (talk) 20:15, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rashmi Singh (author) Afd[edit]

Hello! Can you please help me out? This page was created but soon sent for deletion and after a long history of discussions, it was deleted. But they have given me a copy to work upon, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ananyaprasad/Rashmi_Singh If it reaches their desired mark, it can be accepted. Kindly help.Ananyaprasad (talk) 03:10, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, as per my understanding of wiki rules, pls don't try to create wiki pages of authors who have written 1 or 2 books which were not reviewed by reputed third party journals/websites etc. If you want, I can help you out in creating the wiki page for Love's journey. However, I will have to do some research regarding the book and make an opinion on its notability. Thanks. Boolyme बूलीमी ^{Chat बोलो!!} 17:58, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but the author has written 4 books and her work reviewed by Economic Time and interviewed by The Telegraph Ananyaprasad (talk) 05:20, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Poonam Pandey for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Poonam Pandey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poonam Pandey (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jsharpminor (talk) 19:08, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Boolyme. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re-initiating INCOTM[edit]

It's been almost an year since "Indian collaboration of the month" was active. Firstly we need to restart this as soon as possible for development of India-related articles to greater heights. The members page was blanked, where many of them are inactive. This mass message is to all the members of WikiProject India, about this and interested editors interested will sign up. After this message gets delivered, we'll wait for 7 days before we start a discussion under a thread on the collaboration's talk page, among the members. The discussion will include what to clean-up of sub-pages, a new set of guidelines for smooth and uninterrupted functioning of the collaboration etc. Please keep all the discussions under this thread only, so that it will easier for future reference. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re-initiating INCOTM[edit]

It's been almost an year since "Indian collaboration of the month" was active. Firstly we need to restart this as soon as possible for development of India-related articles to greater heights. The members page was blanked, where many of them are inactive. This mass message is to all the members of WikiProject India, about this and interested editors interested will sign up. After this message gets delivered, we'll wait for 7 days before we start a discussion under a thread on the collaboration's talk page, among the members. The discussion will include what to clean-up of sub-pages, a new set of guidelines for smooth and uninterrupted functioning of the collaboration etc. Please keep all the discussions under this thread only, so that it will easier for future reference. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Incubator/Indian military history[edit]

You are invited to join the Indian military history work-group, an initiative of the Military history WikiProject. This group is to exclusively deal with the topics related to Indian military. If you're interested, please add you name to the participants list. Ignore if you are already a member. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Indian defence services[edit]

You are requested to participate in the discussion of Wiki Loves Indian defence services on the talk page of WikiProject India. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India)[edit]

Greetings,

It is being planned to organize Wikigraphists Bootcamp in India, please fill out the survey form to help the organizers. Your responses will help organizers understand what level of demand there is for the event (how many people in your community think it is important that the event happens). At the end of the day, the participants will turn out to have knowledge to create drawings, illustrations, diagrams, maps, graphs, bar charts etc. and get to know to how to tune the images to meet the QI and FP criteria. For more information and link to survey form, please visit Talk:Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:45, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Supporting Indian Wikipedia Program resource distribution[edit]

In 2017 - 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India chapter (WMIN) and user groups will pilot a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program (Code name: Project Tiger) will:

(a) Support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and

(b) Sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.

The objective of the program is to provide laptops and internet stipends for existing editors who need support to contribute more actively. 50 basic model Acer Chromebooks and Internet stipends for 100 contributors are available for distribution. Provided resources are the sole property of the beneficiaries and should be used for the betterment of the movement.

If you're an active Wikimedian, and interested to receive support from this project, please apply. It will take around 10 minutes of your time, and will ask descriptive questions about your contribution to Indic Wikimedia projects.

Apply at: Supporting Indian Language Wikipedias Program#Apply for support
Last date for submitting applications is 11th February 2018, 11:59 IST.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Project Tiger Writing Contest[edit]

In 2017 – 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India Chapter (WMIN) and user groups from India, are piloting a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program will (a) support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and (b) sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.

Phase (a) has been completed, during which active contributors were awarded laptops and internet stipends. Phase (b) will be a contest in which editors will come together and develop a writing contest focused on content gaps. Each month three individual prizes will be awarded to each community based on their contribution for the month. The prizes worth 3,000 INR, 2000 INR, and 1,000 INR, will be awarded to the top contributors for each month. The contest started at March 1, 2018, 0:00, and will end at May 31, 2018, 23:59 (IST). Useful links are as follows:

Sign up at: Wikipedia:Project Tiger Writing Contest/Participants
List of the articles can be referred at: Wikipedia:Project Tiger Writing Contest/Topics
Submit/report your articles/contributions at: https://tools.wmflabs.org/fountain/editathons/project-tiger-2018-en
For more details, rules, FAQ etc. kindly refer: Wikipedia:Project Tiger Writing Contest

Looking forward your participation, all the best. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) at 22:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC).[reply]

WikiProject India[edit]

WikiProject India

Namaste, Boolyme. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, the old newsletter for WikiProject India ceased circulation in 2010. Now we have re-launched the newsletter in a new way. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Thank you.

Subscribe

Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject India. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge[edit]

Hello Boolyme. You are invited to join the new WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing!
If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by:

{{subst:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge Invite|~~~~}}

Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been pruned from the Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members list.[edit]

Hi Boolyme! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 1 year.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Forced image sizes[edit]

Please stop adding forced image sizes to articles, as you keep doing at Save Indian Family Foundation. As it clearly states at WP:IMAGESIZE
Except with very good reason, do not use px (e.g. |thumb|300px), which forces a fixed image width measured in pixels, disregarding the user's image size preference setting.
The bold is in the guideline, not something I have added. - Arjayay (talk) 16:10, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't hyperventilate. I have a problem with your usage of "you keep doing". Considering your hyperventilation, I think I have a better work offline than you do here. Wishing you long hyperventilation sessions keyboard volunteer. Boolyme बूलीमी ^{Chat बोलो!!} 16:41, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022[edit]

Your edit to Save Indian Family Foundation has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:14, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature and linter errors[edit]

Just a reminder that your signature contains obsolete font tags. They create Linter errors, and it is advised that you change your signature to ''' [[User:Boolyme|Boolyme बूलीमी]] '''[[User_Talk:Boolyme|Chat बोलो!!]] ASAP.

The purpose of this message is because Linter errors affect the way the page looks, and with a lot of errors, the page may render badly. To reduce Linter errors, please change your signature. See WP:SIGFONT for more info.

If the software doesn't accept my replacement signature, let me know, and if that's the case, unfortunately you may have to change it to something else. Sheep (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]