User talk:Boostbyslinky

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Boostbyslinky, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Hanson Dozen, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 15:52, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hanson Dozen[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Hanson Dozen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 15:52, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Hanson Dozen, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 16:03, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Hanson Dozen, you may be blocked from editing. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 16:12, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Hanson Dozen. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:13, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your article[edit]

Whatever you were intending, this isn't the place for it. You can play jokes on people via Facebook or Twitter, but not here. And, you couldn't delete it. Only admins can do that. I'm going to advise you that unless you can show reliably and independently (WP:RS) that Hanson dozen is a suitable subject for an article, a repost will be considered as vandalism. In case you think we are humourless, no, we aren't, outside article space. When it comes to articles, yes we are. Peridon (talk) 16:52, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]