Hello, Borealdreams. You have new messages at Huon's talk page. Message added 01:29, 15 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
I've removed this discussion, points noted, as I'm more interested (see below discussion) in moving forward than engaging in a pissing match that goes no where.
ahh, I get it now ... you claiming I have a CoI, am "edit warring" and posting "fringe" subjects is just your way of saying you are right without having to defend yourself. Got it! Now quit bothering me. Borealdreams (talk) 03:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Lightning rod. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Guy Macon (talk) 07:43, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[removed condescending comments & allegations of my wrongdoing by Guy Macon] Borealdreams (talk) 03:48, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No you're absolutely right Guy, I have more interest in being neutral than you do. Instead of battling me on something you have no viable/credible/working knowledge in, why haven't you worked towards making necessary changes I've requested in the area you do have knowledge of... Surge Protection? Loose the condescending tone with me, or go away as I'm tired of your obvious bs. Borealdreams (talk)
Question about your mentioning of a magnetic field increasing point discharge[edit]
In the Lightning Rod article, you made a change, where you indicate, that the point discharge is stronger, the stronger the magnetic field is.
Also on the talk page of the same article you mention this:
"any point in a magnetic field will cause ionization to occur proportional to the strength of the magnetic field"
I would be very grateful to you, if you could explain, why a magnetic field does have such an effect on a point discharge. Up until now, I always thought only the electric field strength is responsible for the strength of the discharge. Or you could indicate some source which describes this effect. Thank you. World-shanti (talk) 18:10, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You make a valid point. It's probably more semantics than anything else. Whether to use "electric", "electro-magnetic" or "magnetic", they are all referring to the same thing, but probably "electric" is the best to use.
Interesting that of all the changes I made in the LR page, this would be the only comment about any. But, aye, the page has become so convoluted, it barely qualifies as a valid encyclopedic article anymore. It'd be nice if it just vanished into the ether. Borealdreams (talk) 16:31, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there. I closed your redirect for discussion section as that is not the proper location. You have an ongoing content issue/dispute, which should be discussed on talkpages and made through consensus, not through edits such as this. ~ Amory(u • t • c) 18:13, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lightning Eliminators & Consultants, Inc., a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:24, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lightning Eliminators & Consultants, Inc.}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Lightning rod. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Guy Macon (talk) 07:43, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
