User talk:Bostonboy85

Welcome...

Hello, Bostonboy85, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

It's a bit overdue, but here you go!

Again, welcome! —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 21:11, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:We are not faraway.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:We are not faraway.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:13, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:P1010239.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:P1010239.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 21:24, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:New-background.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:New background.jpg. The copy called Image:New background.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 16:15, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blood Mountain[edit]

I have removed the references you added to this article. A film which hasn't been released -- heck, let along been produced -- doesn't qualify as noteworthy. I encourage you to examine Wikipedia's policies on noteworthiness, particularly how Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Please contact me or the Wikipedia help desk should you have any questions. Cheers, Majoreditor (talk) 03:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have also removed this information. Once the film is made, or if mention is made of the film in third party reliable sources prior to that, then it can be re-added. Thanks. Pastordavid (talk) 17:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note[edit]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. Pastordavid (talk) 17:24, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Your most recent edits to Blood Mountain left the article disfigured. Note how a section of the article and photo were shifted below the footnotes. You'll want to check out WP:HELP to sind out how to format articles.

And there's also the issue about notability. Honestly, one online blurb about a plan to make a film just doesn't qualify as noteworthy. Please feel free to seek a third opinion if you diagree. Cheers, Majoreditor (talk) 15:47, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vennila Films[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Vennila Films, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://vennilafilms.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Vennila films[edit]

A tag has been placed on Vennila films, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. CardinalDan (talk) 04:37, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. CardinalDan (talk) 04:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Vennila films. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Pinkadelica ^{Say it...} 04:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Bostonboy85! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 941 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Parthiban Shanmugam - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:22, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of All because of you (song)"All because of you" (song)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on All because of you (song)"All because of you" (song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GouramiWatcher ^(Gulp) 17:34, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Expressions (2011[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Expressions (2011. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Expressions (2011). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Expressions (2011) - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. GouramiWatcher ^(Gulp) 17:37, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]