User talk:Bowzee

Little context in Antichristian[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Antichristian, by Iknowyourider (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Antichristian is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Antichristian, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Antichristian itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:55, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Pt-br-tatu.ogg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Pt-br-tatu.ogg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Pt-br-armadilho.ogg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Pt-br-armadilho.ogg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Geekologie[edit]

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to Geekologie, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the material had to be removed for the following two reasons:

1. First, the material was supported solely by a primary source. We need secondary sources for this. 2. Second, the cited source does not say there there is only one writer, so yoru edit's woding, in you refer to that person as "the writer" is not supported by that cite, as the website continued for over a year. The mere departure of one writer from a website does not merit inclusion.

I explicitly explained the second point in my first edit summary, and although I neglected to also mention the first, I included it in my second edit summary. However, you nonetheless restored the material after I removed it the first time.

Please do not revert edits unless you can explain the rationale for your edits in an edit summary. If you disagree with another editor's edits or their rationale, do not engage in edit-warring; start a discussion on the article's talk page, where you can explain your position. I'd be more than happy to discuss it with you. Nightscream (talk) 21:57, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I explained it in the talk section. You are artificially manipulating the history of Geekologie and should not be removing facts from this or any other article. Bowzee (talk) 22:17, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]