User talk:BoxerMan21

Welcome[edit]

Hello, BoxerMan21! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Aboutmovies (talk) 06:52, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BoxerMan21 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I should not be blocked. I do not vandalize. I make very helpful edits. Those are my reasons.

Decline reason:

As pointed out below, you are not blocked. If you are not able to edit, you will need to provide more information by following the instructions you receive when trying to edit —DoRD (talk) 04:33, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You do not appear to be blocked directly. What message are you getting when you try to edit? --Kinu ^t/_c 01:07, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

iPear Store[edit]

If you have a reference that states "iPear Store" will be the next episode and it will air on May 5th, please add it. If not, do not add the episode information. - Alec2011 (talk) 02:21, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article List of Victorious episodes, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kevinbrogers (talk) 01:46, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012[edit]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to iCarly (season 6). Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kevinbrogers (talk) 01:21, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to ICarly. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Webclient101 (talk) 04:38, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at True Jackson, VP, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Webclient101 (talk) 04:39, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Spencer^T♦C 05:36, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wizards of Waverly Place ( 1 hr special)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wizards of Waverly Place ( 1 hr special) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Webclient101 (talk) 04:40, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of iCarly episodes, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Continues as before adding dubious, unreferenced and likely fake info to episodes. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:52, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of one month as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Daniel Case (talk) 18:14, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

UNBLOCK ME!!!!!! I HAVEN'T EDITED WIKIPEDIA IN WEEKS AND YET I WAS REBLOCKED IMMEDIETLY WHEN THE BLOCK EXPIRED. I DEMAND THAT YOU UNBLOCK ME!

December 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Widr. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Larry King, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Widr (talk) 20:43, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's Larry L. King, the author, not Larry King, the TV/radio personality. Widr (talk) 20:51, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No harm done. Unfortunately Larry L. King doesn't have a Wiki page, so you can't add that information there. Widr (talk) 20:55, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013[edit]

Nominated your account for further administrative intervention, at WP:AIV as it appears you are incapable of making constructive edits to Wikipedia. [1] [2] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for continuing to insert deliberate misinformation into Wikipedia articles, as you did at SpongeBob SquarePants. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —Darkwind (talk) 04:14, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Victorious, you may be blocked from editing. Unreferenced, bogus info likely hoax attempt Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:59, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do not create, add, or restore hoaxes to Wikipedia, such as you did with the article Victorious. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Even though you are removing the hoax info you are adding to this article and others ([3]), stop putting this in the article in the first place. There is not possible way that Disney will ever pick up and resurrect a Dan Schneider series, stop adding this BS. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:02, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]