User talk:BradleyMamba24

January 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm LuK3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Josh McCown, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. In addition, please read Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:49, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Matt Rhule, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 13:52, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Eagles247. An edit that you recently made to Matt Rhule seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:12, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Robby Anderson. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Eagles 24/7 (C) 15:56, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Freddie Kitchens. Eagles 24/7 (C) 15:56, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:33, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This account is not a sock puppet[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BradleyMamba24 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m not a sock puppet, look at all my edits, they’ve all had true statements and some factual info, such as saying Philip Rivers is now a free agent, well supposedly it “isn’t official” until March 18t, despite The chargers announcing they have mutual agreed to part ways, so it’s “vandalism”, also same thing with a Kobe edit I made, I said his #24 got retired by the Mavericks, but it’s not “official” yet despite Mark Cuban, the mavs owner, saying it will be done. I’ve seen I got banned from adding factual info to pages, but it’s vandalism since “it’s not official yet” despite teams owners stating it will be done. I don’t see how that’s “vandalism” it’s not like I’m putting rivers on the Colts before it’s even happened. Now that mambagoat account is mine, but it got banned for the same shit,This eagles dude just has a personal vendetta against me for making a edit a while back on my old account, that then led to a ban from editing for 31 hours because I made a “edit that was not official, it’s just speculation” but then that guy signed with the team I said, making my edit all factual and the ban from editing unnecessary

Decline reason:

That you were right about one poorly sourced rumor doesn't make your edits okay. You created this account after your other account- there is no other way to interpret this other than you did so to evade your block. You need to return to your original account to request unblock. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 18:02, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.