User talk:Brainman69

January 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Luke10.27. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Jonathan Wells (cricketer), but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Luke10.27 (talk) 00:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jonathan Wells (cricketer). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Patient Zero^talk 00:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jonathan Wells (cricketer), you may be blocked from editing. Rehsarb (talk) 01:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Jonathan Wells (cricketer). Materialscientist (talk) 01:37, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adam "Dizzy" Disisto (January 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timothytyy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adam "Dizzy" Disisto and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Timothytyy (talk) 06:23, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brainman69! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Timothytyy (talk) 06:23, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]