User talk:Brassmonger

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Brassmonger, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 19:20, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

August 2018[edit]

Please give edit summaries in English. Most editors of the English language edition of Wikipedia do not understand Bulgarian. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:14, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

Please, stop spam in my talk page from other users.<ref>°′M″≈

Hello, I'm Jingiby. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 14:04, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hristo Tashev (September 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hristo Tashev and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hristo Tashev, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 15:07, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brassmonger! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- RoySmith (talk) 15:07, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ivan Benchev (September 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:ANYBIO, lacks any sources or references

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ivan Benchev and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ivan Benchev, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:56, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Dan arndt ( Brassmonger Wal 07:02, 3 September 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Ways to improve Yordan Tabov[edit]

Hi, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. Brassmonger, thanks for creating Yordan Tabov!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references with in-depth coverage about the subject from independent reliable sources to the article to meet our verifiability and notablility requirements.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 07:45, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Can you give me an example of references with in-depth coverage about the subject from independent reliable sources using only external links.? (07:57 User:Brassmonger, 3 September 2018 (UTC))

Hi Brassmonger, I have removed Tabov from the list of historians because he is not a professional historian and has any special historical education. The fact he wrote some amateur books about Bulgarian history that were rejected by Bulgarian historical society as pseudo-scientific works, makes him not a historian. Regards. Jingiby (talk) 10:49, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For the Bulgarian historians and the autochthonous theory[редактиране на кода][edit]

To <gingybi> I understand that the theories of these historians have not been accepted today and are unproven, but some of the information you add in sections of the articles is not relevant to Bulgarian readers here and abroad. > If you really want to prove this, do it in your own words without "changing or deleteions" the original content of the articles translation and confirm it with sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brassmonger (talk • contribs) 12:11, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The are simply not historians, with exception of Tsenov. Jingiby (talk) 17:57, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ezerovo, Plovdiv Province[edit]

Hi, I'm SkyGazer 512. Brassmonger, thanks for creating Ezerovo, Plovdiv Province!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Could you support all of the material within the article with a reliable source? Currently most of the article is unsourced, so the information can't be verified.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 13:47, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018[edit]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources and take this opportunity to add reliable references to the article. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 08:48, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Jingiby (talk) 13:50, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with submission of Draft:Nikolay Nikolaev Todorov.

Brassmonger .Wal 20:28, 10 September 2018 (UTC) Brassmonger

Hi! So, specifically, how are you looking for help with the draft? Strikerforce^Talk 20:31, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Strikerforce: I wish someone to approve the draft as soon as possible and in order that thing to happen the draft needs to be reviewed. If you do not have this opportunity, check out our draft and indicate any serious issues, I have to solve to be successful. Brassmonger .Wal 20:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikolay Nikolaev Todorov (September 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Strikerforce was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Notability stills feels insufficiently established. I have noted multiple other concerns, as well, in previous edit summaries.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nikolay Nikolaev Todorov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nikolay Nikolaev Todorov, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Strikerforce^Talk 19:20, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikolay Nikolaev Todorov (September 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Strikerforce was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Issues from my previous decline still exist.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nikolay Nikolaev Todorov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nikolay Nikolaev Todorov, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Strikerforce^Talk 21:02, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikolay Nikolaev Todorov (September 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Strikerforce was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nikolay Nikolaev Todorov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nikolay Nikolaev Todorov, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Strikerforce^Talk 17:48, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nikolay Nikolaev Todorov moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Nikolay Nikolaev Todorov, does not have enough sources and citations and contains unverified information. I have moved it to draftspace to await AfC review. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 22:06, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop messing with drafts - you are not qualified to review and your edits are disruptive. See here. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:25, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mail train. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not move articles to draft space without a valid reason and the necessary permissions. Natureium (talk) 19:31, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Stop editing AFC submitted drafts or recently declined drafts - you do not meet the requirements to review and your edits are purely disruptive. As an example, you've repeatedly added categories where they should not be, you continue to overlink despite WP:MOS, this is just utter nonsense, you randomly submitted nearly a year old draft that hadn't addressed the requested changes and i'm not even sure what the purpose of this is. Stop. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:49, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikolay Nikolaev Todorov (September 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://wikibulgaria.wikia.com/wiki/Nikolay_Nikolaev_Todorov_(pfhilologist). Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Nikolay Nikolaev Todorov may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 20:38, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It,s not taken from wikia because i have created the same article there earlier. Brassmonger .Wal 12:28, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Catholic Church sex abuse cases by country, you may be blocked from editing. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 18:02, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add to what Frayae said and suggest you stop all of this disruptive editing as only a few days ago I gave you a final warning and have adequately explained both on Wikipedia and on the help channel why your edits are disruptive. If you continue to do so, this will be taken to WP:ANI. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:06, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Brassmonger, almost all your contributions have been undone by other editors because they are not constructive. You have clearly not read the rules or are perhaps not interested in the rules. I suggest you don't do complicated process based edits such as pagemoves, PROD's, tagging, dealing with categories, or trying to help other editors until you have fully read and comprehended at least the basics of Wikipedia policy. Otherwise you may be restricted from editing on Wikipedia. Take this seriously. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 18:11, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Natureium (talk) 18:28, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 20:47, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monika Valerieva (October 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Monika Valerieva and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Monika Valerieva, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 16:41, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of villages in Plovdiv Province, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ezerovo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hristo Tashev (November 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is no claim of any notability. Fails WP:CREATIVE.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hristo Tashev and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hristo Tashev, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 09:05, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I created that page Osbaldwick steam train station it’s not real[edit]

I check 6 months later Homer Simpsons666 (talk) 18:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm Jingiby. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 19:41, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hristak Mitev for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hristak Mitev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hristak Mitev until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:14, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Aesthetics. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:32, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dushko Venelinov Vulchev[edit]

The article Dushko Venelinov Vulchev has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ~ Amkgp 💬 18:40, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dushko Venelinov Vulchev[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dushko Venelinov Vulchev requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Capewearer (talk) 13:40, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your custom signature[edit]

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you. 18:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]