User talk:Brent19

Jeff Parkes[edit]

Hi there! I noticed that you put up a {{hangon}} template. Please remember to actually write a reason for why the article should continue to exist. Thank you. Philip Gronowski ^Contribs 19:01, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This reason should be on the articles talk page. Thank you. Philip Gronowski ^Contribs 19:04, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Jeffparkes.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Jeffparkes.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:07, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Jeff-parkes.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Jeff-parkes.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:01, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page[edit]

Please do not remove other users' comments from your talk page. See Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines; such activity could be considered vandalism and can result in a block.

Eric Lindros[edit]

Please do not add unverifiable and speculatory information about Lindros' future team, per WP:NOT. Reports only suggest that he will sign with Dallas as early as today. Unless an official annoucement is made, such information is not verifiable and cannot be included on Wikipedia. Someone like Brendan Shanahan was heavily rumoured to be heading to the Bruins, but he signed with the Rangers at the last minute. --Madchester 15:18, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy against WP:NPA. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list.

Unblock denied. This is not acceptable. Naconkantari 18:24, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, we encourage you to create a new account. — FireFox ^(talk) _{20:34, 03 August '06}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brent19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have the right to free speach.

Decline reason:

Please point to which law (or which paragraph of our terms and condition of use) that gives you the right to free "speach" on Wikipedia. ➨ ЯEDVERS 09:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brent19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Freedom of speech

Decline reason:

Freedom of speech isn't the Freedom to have whatever you like published by whoever you like.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brent19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Speech That one. Oh, sorry, I typo'ed speech.

Decline reason:

Wikipedia:Rights and Wikipedia:Free speech. Wikipedia is not a democracy. Sorry and goodbye. ➨ ЯEDVERS 21:37, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brent19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Its been 2 months.

Decline reason:

Your block is indefinite. And judging by this not ever being used for anything decent it will never be unblocked. If you want to contribute in a civilized manner, please create a new account.--Konstable 05:13, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.