User talk:Brianfedirko
Speedy deletion nomination of Poptimist[edit]
A tag has been placed on Poptimist, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 05:06, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
The article Instaweb has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Better used in the instagram article then having it's own.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SKATER T a l k 19:51, 26 October 2013 (UTC) SKATER T a l k 19:51, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Hey, I don't mean any hard feelings. Here's my rationale for reverting your edits:
- The phrase "to an observer in an inertial reference frame" is important to highlight the change in perspective from the earth-fixed observer in the first paragraph. Moving it to the end makes that change less obvious, and putting it in parentheses downplays its importance.
- Also, a semicolon would only be used if that phrase were an independent clause. It serves the same function as "For an observer on the North Pole" in the first paragraph, and as such only needs a comma.
Hope this makes sense. Please let me know if you have any questions.
--Lasunncty (talk) 00:39, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
reply to your message[edit]
Sure, drop me a line or ping me if you have any questions. Meters (talk) 04:54, 20 April 2017 (UTC)