User talk:BrightOrion/Archive 7

Why?[edit]

I don't understand why you remove "the" from Symphony No. 2 (Beethoven). That is no true title, such as Fidelio, just a generic name. Consider reverting yourself, in all these cases. You wouldn't say "Second Symphony is a symphony", or would you? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:50, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the title has "No." then I believe you don't need "the". It's different from "second". Like the following page, for example.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No._2_Commando

The style used for symphonies on Wikipedia varies, with some having "the" and some not. You can see a selection here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symphony_No._5

I don't think "the" is correct. BrightOrion | talk 09:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See MOS:VAR: if a given style varies, you should not arbitrarily change it. intforce (talk) 10:13, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:VAR is for "When either of two styles are acceptable" but I don't think "the" is correct English. That's why I am raising the point here. At least it's being discussed now.

The website of Encyclopedia Britannica also corroborates my opinion.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Symphony-No-9-in-D-Minor

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Eroica-Symphony

BrightOrion | talk 10:19, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you opened discussions on both Talk:Symphony No. 5 (Mahler) and Talk:Symphony No. 3 (Beethoven). Perhaps it would be best to hold a more centralized discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical music. intforce (talk) 10:16, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Gerda and intforce that "The Symphony No. …" sounds more natural. All of LvB's and Mahler's symphonies use that wording. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 11:04, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not in any way being rude or impolite, but are you a native English speaker? I ask because it is relevant to this discussion. Gerda I believe is German. I don't know about intforce. Also, where do all of LvB's and Mahler's symphonies use that wording? Please state a source outside of Wikipedia?

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Symphony-No-3-symphony-by-Mahler

https://www.universaledition.com/gustav-mahler-448/works/3-symphonie-540

https://utahsymphony.org/explore/2015/01/mahler-3-listening-guide/

BrightOrion | talk 11:38, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest we continue this discussion on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical music page. Tim riley talk 15:19, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature[edit]

Hi there; I notice that your signature as used here for example, uses a bare pipe. This is causing problems on some pages, for example at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Language and linguistics where the entry for Talk:Bengal tiger stops abruptly - at the exact point where your signature has a bare pipe. In accordance with Wikipedia:Signatures#Treat as wiki markup, please fix your signature so that it does not include this bare pipe, for example by altering it from this:

[[User:BrightOrion|<font color="#0080ff" face="consolas">Bright</font>'''Orion''']] | [[User talk:BrightOrion|<font color="#336699" face="Calibri">talk</font>]]

to this:

[[User:BrightOrion|<font color="#0080ff" face="consolas">Bright</font>'''Orion''']] &#124; [[User talk:BrightOrion|<font color="#336699" face="Calibri">talk</font>]]

You should probably also address the use of the obsolete ... tags. Thanks. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that! Changed it. BrightOrion (talk) 22:11, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Did you know that you can shorten '''Bright''' to Bright, a saving of twelve bytes? This is because the style= attribute is valid on all HTML elements, and the span element is really only useful if no other element encloses the same piece of text. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:12, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Darby Allin edit[edit]

Not sure why you took the revert on Bengal tiger to heart, but I don't appreciate looking through my contributions and doing this and potentially this. I get you're trying to fix things, but I know for a fact you would never be on that page without looking through my contributions. Thanks. Groovehx (talk) 13:24, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I didn't do the "longest-reigning" edit. The other edit I did, because I didn't see the distinction between "videos" and "video clips". I found that page by looking at your edits, yes. By the way, why did you feel my ordering of the countries on the Bengal tiger page was "unnecessary"? I listed the countries in order of number of tigers, otherwise it would have been a random listing. It matched the following sentence. No hard feelings! BrightOrion (talk) 13:33, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Johnson (boxer) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Johnson (boxer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Johnson (boxer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

².O.^Boxing 20:07, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yes–no question, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]