User talk:Britney901

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Britney901! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! FlowerpotmaN·(t) 02:58, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Stephen Molaro[edit]

A tag has been placed on Stephen Molaro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, article #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Gray PorpoisePhocoenidae, not Delphinidae 04:04, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Anne Hathaway (actress). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Gwernol 02:00, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Regina, Saskatchewan, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gwernol 02:01, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Enyne, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:50, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Elephant[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.  :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 19:09, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The New Groove Orchestra[edit]

A tag has been placed on The new groove orchestra, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Goodnightmush 03:22, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

I'm utterly uninterested in how awesome steve is [1] - please stop vandalising wikipedia and start helping to improve it. You're just going to get blocked otherwise. Cheers. --Mcginnly | Natter 17:53, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Joe_rogan.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Joe_rogan.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Angel_som.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Angel_som.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Root.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Root.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:21, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Molaro[edit]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Mark Molaro, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. feydey 16:23, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Anne_Hathaway_007.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Anne_Hathaway_007.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:58, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Anne_hathaway_02.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Anne_hathaway_02.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images on Anne Hathaway[edit]

Wikipedia wants images that are freely available to anybody, whereas most publicity photos are still owned by somebody who wants to retain control. Of course Wikipedia makes exceptions where there is no free alternative available (somebody's dead, for example, or to depict a character rather than an actor), but in the case of a living celebrity that's not a realistic argument - theoretically, you could attend a film festival or award ceremony and take a pic. See Brad Pitt for an example. (Quentin X 20:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Stevie.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Stevie.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:32, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Stevie_carell.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Stevie_carell.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:55, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Janel.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Janel.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:09, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Derek Friesen[edit]

A tag has been placed on Derek Friesen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - Zeibura S. Kathau (Info | Talk) 19:13, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jordan Brass[edit]

A tag has been placed on Jordan Brass, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. VirtualDelight 20:52, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Stephen Molaro[edit]

A tag has been placed on Stephen Molaro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Nehrams2020 23:08, 24 September 2007 (UTC) --Nehrams2020 23:08, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:Main17.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Main17.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 23:05, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:Bushwakker.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bushwakker.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 00:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bushwakker.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bushwakker.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:03, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last warn[edit]

This is your last warning.
The next time you create an inappropriate page such as Jordan brass, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki 19:47, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chicken Teriyaki Recipe[edit]

A Proposed Deletion template has been added to the article Chicken Teriyaki Recipe, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page.  – Tivedshambo (talk) 23:18, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may like to consider contributing to Wikibooks instead - I believe they have a recipes section. – Tivedshambo (talk) 23:20, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Martin LeBoldus High School[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dr. Martin LeBoldus High School, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.rcsd.ca/leboldus/default.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:33, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Steve Patterson (comedian)[edit]

I have nominated Steve Patterson (comedian), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Patterson (comedian). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:04, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help me tag[edit]

The helpme tag should go on your own talk page (here :O)), but seeing as I am here, can I help? FlowerpotmaN·(t) 02:51, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Someone is trying to delete a page I'm still working on still because it doesn't have enough sources or something. What should I do?

Ah, there is a minor problem of me having participated in the AFD discussion, so I can't really get into a big discussion here, but in general, articles must be backed up by independent third party sources for verifiability reasons. Tell you what, I will add a Welcome message on the top of this page, which will give you more information (Should have got one earlier.) FlowerpotmaN·(t) 02:57, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again[edit]

Still working away on Steve Patterson (comedian), I see :O). Just a thought, but can I suggest that you change some of the references to a site other than his own site. They are out there; I know I mentioned a few in the Articles for deletion discussion. It's not that the existing references are suggesting anything that isn;t true, but it's better (actually policy too) to source information from independent sources that aren't actually connected to the subject. But from the qquick search I did during the AFD, there are plenty of outside sources. Give me a shout if you need to. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 22:25, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


January 2008[edit]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images, however, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded, specifically Image:Stewie_peeing.jpg, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reason, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. Please note that we take very seriously our criteria on non-free image uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. [2]

Since we have a free use image for the Seth MacFarlane article, this additional image is not needed. / edg ☺ ☭ 18:52, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008[edit]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images, however, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded, specifically Image:Andy hathy.jpg, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reason, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. Please note that we take very seriously our criteria on non-free image uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. The Evil Spartan (talk) 21:03, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An Invite to join Saskatchewan WikiProject[edit]

Hi, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the Saskatchewan WikiProject! The Saskatchewan WikiProject is a fairly new WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, and Wikiprojects, to do with anything Saskatchewan.

As you have shown an interest in Beverley Breuer we thought you might like to take an interest in this growing WikiProject.
Please assist with any ongoing requests
You might like to take an extra interest in our To Do list
Another project dedicated to Saskatchewan is the Saskatchewan Roads and Highways Wikiproject
Also, a descendant project for Saskatchewan is the WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods
We look forward to welcoming you to the project! SriMesh | talk 02:55, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Armand Sabal-Lecco[edit]

A tag has been placed on Armand Sabal-Lecco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. WebHamster 00:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Your edit to X-ray[edit]

Please see my apology on Talk:X-ray for my over-hasty reversion of your recent edit. --Old Moonraker (talk) 21:33, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Tatianam.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Tatianam.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:08, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Tatianam.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Tatianam.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 22:52, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Infectious mononucleosis[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Infectious mononucleosis, you will be blocked from editing. Jwkpiano1 (talk) 19:37, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Thisisme.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Thisisme.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:11, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Thisisme.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Thisisme.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Three-toed sloth, you will be blocked from editing. Anaxial (talk) 21:35, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010[edit]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Janelle (given names). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 04:49, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Steve Patterson (comedian) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Patterson (comedian) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Patterson (comedian) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Orange Mike | Talk 00:01, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Zack Werner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Media (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Scott Weinger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Mike, Aladdin (film), Shredder, The Family Man (TV series) and What I Like About You

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Information icon Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Fox. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you are given a good deal of freedom in what you write. – Fayenatic London 08:25, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Britney901. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:33, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Britney901 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was bored. I won't mess up articles again. I will only make good edits. Britney901 (talk) 17:42, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We believe your account may have been compromised. As per WP:COMPROMISED, it is not eligible for unblock consideration. Even if it wasn't compromised, "I was bored" shows we should leave the account blocked indefinitely. Yamla (talk) 17:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Britney901 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't get why I was blocked indefinitely. I get that I vandalized the Tiger Woods page in April, but I haven't done anything like that since. It was just a one time thing.

Decline reason:

You've been evading your block as Steve901. PhilKnight (talk) 10:29, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This account has never edited Tiger Woods. Are you indicating you have violated WP:EVADE in addition to generally inappropriate edits for more than a decade? --Yamla (talk) 21:32, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


I was suspended for 24 hours because I edited Tiger Wood's page in April. What inappropriate edits are you talking about?(talk) 00:31, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you Steve901 (talk · contribs)? PhilKnight (talk) 04:27, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed. That basically scotches any possibility that Britney901 has been acting in good faith. I have upgraded the block to reflect this violation of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. Note that account was so rampantly abusive that it was blocked on its own merits. --Yamla (talk) 10:19, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Britney901&oldid=1068418223"