User talk:Broadwayfan91

Welcome to Wikipedia[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Broadwayfan91, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --SJP:Happy Verterans Day! 20:00, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Anderson (AW)

A tag has been placed on Kevin Anderson (AW), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. The Helpful One (Talk) 21:32, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Wayne-addison.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Wayne-addison.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:09, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Kevin-anderson.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Kevin-anderson.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Ted-bancroft.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ted-bancroft.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kevin Anderson (Another World character)[edit]

Kevin Anderson (Another World character), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Kevin Anderson (Another World character) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Anderson (Another World character) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Kevin Anderson (Another World character) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Avruch ^Talk 19:28, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Alice-matthews2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Alice-matthews2.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ScottBryce.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:ScottBryce.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:35, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:DylanBruce.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:DylanBruce.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:18, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Judgelowell1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Judgelowell1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI 23:32, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Roger Heckerman[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Roger Heckerman, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Roger Heckerman seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Roger Heckerman, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot 01:00, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can you please provide verifiable sources that show the subject meets WP:BIO? Dlohcierekim 01:20, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To respond to your note in the article. Not all American playwrites are notable. What awards has he won? What press coverage has he had? What source can you provide? Also, please place commentary in the talk page instead of the article. Thanks, Dlohcierekim 01:20, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but that's the subject's webpage. A verifiable source is one that is independent of the subject. Newspaper articles, books, reviews, magazines. Things like that. Dlohcierekim 01:26, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tags from articles. The hangon tag suffices. Please work on finding verifiable sources supporting meeting WP:BIO Dlohcierekim 01:49, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted[edit]

Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, this has been deleted twice, once by User:Philippe and again by me. Please review our guidelines for articles about people, WP:BIO. Please do not continue to recreate this. If you want to appeal the deletion, please take the matter to Deletion Review. Thanks, Dlohcierekim 13:48, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Run Over The Canadians[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Run Over The Canadians, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Run Over The Canadians. Dlohcierekim 01:34, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Backstage Drama[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Backstage Drama, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Backstage Drama. Dlohcierekim 01:36, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Anderson (Another World character)[edit]

I see you removed the AFD notice. Please do not do this. It in no way will affect the outcome of the discussion or improve the encyclopedic quality of the subject. Instead, please find sources that assert the notability of the subject. Dlohcierekim 01:58, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i got a refrences...look on that page

Enjoyed chatting[edit]

I've got to stop now. I'll take another look in the morning, if no other admin deletes it before I get back to it. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 02:14, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Run Over The Canadians[edit]

Run Over The Canadians, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Run Over The Canadians satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Run Over The Canadians and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Run Over The Canadians during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dlohcierekim 13:52, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Backstage Drama[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Backstage Drama, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Run Over The Canadians. Thank you. Dlohcierekim 14:01, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 23:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Rosencrantz , you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 23:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted your incomplete AfD request of Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead because it appears to be part of a series of vandalism and abuse from you on that article. Please don't disrupt Wikipedia to try to prove a point - if you have any serious questions or concerns about notability and the AfD processes, feel free to ask me or to try the Wikipedia help desk. --McGeddon 00:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Chrishughes3.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Chrishughes3.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 05:15, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mot-gameshow.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mot-gameshow.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 04:51, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Timkelly.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Timkelly.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:42, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Alice-matthews.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Alice-matthews.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:19, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Grease2007.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Grease2007.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:26, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Brian-bancroft.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Brian-bancroft.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:59, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Judge James T. Lowell[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Judge James T. Lowell, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Magioladitis (talk) 10:06, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ted Bancroft[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ted Bancroft, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Very poor text. Character fails notability outside its show.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Magioladitis (talk) 02:19, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wayne Addison for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wayne Addison is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wayne Addison until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:48, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]