User talk:Brougham96

Please put your messages under a new section title (unless you are replying to another message). Also please sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~).

Please note that I spend a lot of my time looking for vandalism.. In doing so I occasionally make mistakes (nobody's perfect). If you think my reverting of your article is unjust, please let me know why.

Request For Rollback

 Done Please review WP:RBK thoroughly and remember that any misuse can lead to the tools removal. Also, can you please address the image source concerns as noted in the BOT edits above when you have a mo. Any need for help just ask me! Pedro :  Chat  20:42, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

I actually adressed these issues shortly after reciving the messages. I just didnt take them down. Thanks for the rollback though (in case you come back and read this) --Brougham96 (talk)

Sorry

Sorry about this revert I made to an edit of yours. I was going to revert the edit made by the IP address earlier, but your edit appeared just when I pressed the revert button, and your edit got erased instead. I am very sorry about this, and also for any confusion it might have caused you. :) Chamal ^Talk/_Sign 15:07, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Michael Savage (commentator)

Please be careful when reverting vandalism. You reverted back to an earlier version that also had vandalism in it. JoshuaZ (talk) 16:44, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Pictures

Hi, I wonder if I can ask you a question:

I want to add an image I found in a book(a reproduction of a 17th Century portrtait) to a wikipedia article. Is there any legal problem in doing this?. Inchiquin (talk) 04:18, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jason Lewis (radio host)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jason Lewis (radio host), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Appraiser (talk) 02:46, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Since someone else tagged the page for deletion, and since you object, note the label phrase "or otherwise object to its deletion for any reason." You are 100% within your rights to remove the tag, so that the decision is left in the Talk page...unless you want it to be deleted automatically in 5 days by some bot ;-) -Gych (talk) 04:22, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion for User:La Pianista/blow up

After your recent post, I have decided to tag that subpage for speedy deletion. I have decided that I didn't need it much, anyways; besides, I could use some room for a sandbox on my navigation bar. :)

No hard feelings,

LaPianista! «talk» 02:49, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Global warming stuff

Hi. As we are getting pretty long-winded on the AfD page I thought I'd come here. Please be sure to read the talk page discussion about op-eds and the like. No one has yet identified a fact that relies on an op-ed source. There may be plenty of them of course, but just saying "this source is biased" is a pretty weak reason to delete an entire article. If the article hinges on non-RSes, that's a good reason to be in AfD. But as the MSM has covered this as a topic, I'm really not seeing a reason to delete (as per the previous AfDs.) Hobit (talk) 16:17, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy delete tags

You comment here that only administrators can remove speedy tags but although lots of people think that only administrators can remove speedy tags this is not the case - any editor other than the creator can remove iy. See WP:DP#Speedy deletion. Dpmuk (talk) 16:07, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Yda Hillis Addis

This is not a speedy candidate, it is a page that is getting blanked by a user. Please check the page's history before nominating articles, the context was there in the history. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 16:51, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Climate change denial

No harm done. I considered making a comment below rather than editing the nom, but the implication was that the nom was withdrawn before attracting any attention, rather than after a snowball victory and an accepted counterargument. Just trying to be fair is all - I'm new to this discussion too. WikiScrubber (talk) 07:21, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Fast

Very fast vandalism reverting using Huggle, mate! :)

Keep up the good work!

P.S. This message serves a dirty purpose too; while you are reading it, I have a slight window of opportunity to revert some vandalism myself. :P

Cheers mate!

Λuα ^{(Operibus anteire)} 14:36, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Herkimer diamond

Please discuss any proposed move on the article talk page. Vsmith (talk) 23:02, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

2008 Chatsworth Metrolink collision

Please see Wikipedia:Lead section#Bold title; thank you. --NE2 05:11, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

I respectfully disagree, I don't think the particular clause you are refering to applies to this article. 2008 Chatsworth Metrolink Collision is the title of the article, and although it could be called by other names, there is a name for the subject. -Brougham96 (talk) 13:58, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Steve L. Spiegel

Hello,

I'd like to contest the speedy deletion of Steve L. Spiegel. He is a prominent Middle East Scholar with a degree from Harvard and has been at UCLA for many years. He has published many articles and books and has been featured in many publications for his knowledge. —Preceding unsigned comment added by *myl2000* (talk • contribs) 17:38, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

*myl2000* (talk) 17:39, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Humphreys, Paul

Humphreys notability is clear. He is one of the pricipal philosophers of emergent properties. He is series editor of three of the most infuential philosophical journals in the world, including the American Philosophical Quarterly. EricDiesel (talk) 02:04, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Fair enough. The version of the page That I tagged didn't asssert notability other than the fact that he is a professor. I see you have add a good bit of content since then, so I pulled the speedy tag, as it no longer meets speedy delete criteria in my opinion. -Brougham96 (talk) 02:08, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Your NPWatcher application

Dear Brougham96,

Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join NPWatcher.

—αἰτίας •discussion• 21:52, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Seriously... I don't care...

I couldn't care less of what you're doing with the TDK sequel article... I just can't understand that you refuse to let the article be, you all know that the movie is happening, why not add the friggin' article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arman88 (talk • contribs) 18:52, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of International Select Provider Organization

Hi, I deleted that page that i created yesterday. Please let me delete it because it's not yet finished and needs more work, I was wrong when I posted it. Thanks.--Jfaerman (talk) 11:17, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castillion

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 22:39, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Politics

Lib? Con? Let me know! { Talking to a young, open-minded girl in search of a political "team" to start a new path with }

Should I be a liberal? Or a conservative? Gimme advice . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.37.235.91 (talk) 02:37, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Kentucky Grilled Chicken listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kentucky Grilled Chicken. Since you had some involvement with the Kentucky Grilled Chicken redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 01:42, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Brougham96. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Brougham96. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)