User talk:राजकुमार

Talk

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Bruhh is here, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! — SamX [talk · contribs] 06:53, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023[edit]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raj sahu z. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 15:24, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Raj sahu z per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raj sahu z. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Courcelles (talk) 15:26, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

राजकुमार (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

After administrator blocked my account, Then I realised that one account can't be used by more than one and use of any AI supported article and edits are not acceptable. I also regret for emphasize my personal interest on article by adding more information about my country. But after this, I started to Edit on Hindi Wikipedia. https://hi.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%A6%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF:Bruhh_is_here. This is my Wikipedia page. I started to Edit more responsibly and didn't repeated my old mistake. You can check my contribution on my hindi Wikipedia page. I kindly request the adminstrator to please review my appeal and unblock my account. I am very passionate about editing article with factual accuracy with trustworthy sources. I was also guilty in sockpuppet investigation and I am ashamed on this. But I will assure that This will not happen again. Thank you राजकुमार (talk) 13:27, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address your abuse of multiple accounts. Yamla (talk) 13:35, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why should I be Unblocked?[edit]

After administrator blocked my account, Then I realised that one account can't be used by more than one and use of any AI supported article and edits are not acceptable. I also regret for emphasize my personal interest on article by adding more information about my country. But after this, I started to Edit on Hindi Wikipedia. https://hi.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%A6%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF:Bruhh_is_here. This is my Wikipedia page. I started to Edit more responsibly and didn't repeated my old mistake. You can check my contribution on my hindi Wikipedia page. I kindly request the adminstrator to please review my appeal and unblock my account. I am very passionate about editing article with factual accuracy with trustworthy sources. I was also guilty in sockpuppet investigation and I am ashamed on this. But I will assure that This will not happen again. Thank you Bruhh is here (talk) 03:53, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #78135[edit]

is closed. Needs to request unblocking via original account. Noting check user block. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:39, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CU blocked[edit]

@J ansari: This user is/was checkuser blocked as a WP:SOCK and so was probably not eligible for a rename. Best, -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:15, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Name doesn't matter. राजकुमार (talk) 04:38, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

राजकुमार (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Administrator,

I am writing to sincerely apologize for my past mistakes and to humbly request the reconsideration of the block on my account. I fully acknowledge the error of emphasizing personal interests in articles and adding excessive information about my country. Since the block, I have taken proactive measures to rectify these issues and have redirected my efforts towards contributing responsibly to Hindi Wikipedia. I assure you that I have gained valuable insights from my past actions and am wholeheartedly committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity in my contributions.

I also want to address the fact that I was involved in abusing multiple accounts, and I am genuinely sorry for any disruption this may have caused. In the spirit of transparency and accountability, I want to emphasize that I am now using only this account. I understand the seriousness of the situation, and I am committed to ensuring that such behaviour does not occur again. Furthermore, I would like to request the deletion of the other account associated with the multiple account issue.

I kindly request you to reconsider the block on my account. Several months have passed since the block was imposed in May, and I am eager to continue contributing positively to Wikipedia. I am dedicated to proving through my actions that I can be a responsible and constructive member of the Wikipedia community.

Thank you for taking the time to consider my appeal. I appreciate your understanding and look forward to the possibility of returning to contribute to Wikipedia. राजकुमार (talk) 06:14, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please write a request without using an AI. 331dot (talk) 09:17, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

राजकुमार (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am deeply regretting my editing mistakes in May. I understand the concerns about biased content and excessive regional focus. Since the block, I've devoted myself to learning and responsible contribution. My passion for Wikipedia remains strong, and I'm committed to upholding its highest standards. I assure you, only responsible edits and a single, verified account are in my future.

May I humbly request a reconsideration of my block?

राजकुमार (talk) 10:08, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please write a request without using an AI. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:02, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Previous request was not AI generated[edit]

@Jpgordon,I kindly request that you take note that my previous request was not generated by an AI. It's worth noting that not all perfect creations are the result of AI. Please reconsider my appeal. राजकुमार (talk) 04:59, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I used many formal words in that request. I don't know that we can also request in casual manner from administrator. राजकुमार (talk) 05:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

राजकुमार (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm really sorry for messing up my edits in May. I understand that the content was biased and too focused on one region. Since then, I've been working hard to learn and make responsible contributions. I still love Wikipedia and I'm committed to its high standards. You can trust me that I'll only make responsible edits now, and I'll use a single verified account.

Could you please reconsider my block? Please don't decline my request without any talk,sir. राजकुमार (talk) 07:16, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After administrator blocked my account, Then I realised that one account can't be used by more than one and use of any AI supported article and edits are not acceptable. I also regret for emphasize my personal interest on article by adding more information about my country. But after this, I started to Edit on Hindi Wikipedia. https://hi.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%A6%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF:%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B0. This is my Wikipedia page. I started to Edit more responsibly and didn't repeated my old mistake. You can check my contribution on my hindi Wikipedia page. I kindly request the adminstrator to please review my appeal and unblock my account. I am very passionate about editing article with factual accuracy with trustworthy sources. I was also guilty in sockpuppet investigation and I am ashamed on this. But I will assure that This will not happen again. Thank you राजकुमार (talk) 07:21, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Happy New Year. Good luck! --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 22:18, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot,I apologize for bothering you. I made some unblock requests a few days ago, but I haven't received any response yet. It's possible that I made the requests simultaneously after my previous request. Could you please reconsider my request? I don't have access to my previous account, and I am currently operating solely from this account. Therefore, I am making the request from this account. Thank you. राजकुमार (talk) 05:50, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your request is open and pending. A checkuser needs to review it, and they are limited in number. 331dot (talk) 09:21, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: Are any CU's aware of the need here? - UtherSRG (talk) 15:34, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Several of us regularly patrol unblock requests. But this is a case where the block occurred many months ago, and CU data for then has expired and is no longer available. Behavioral evidence is all we have at this point. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:27, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Jpgordon,@331dot and @UtherSRG, Could you kindly explain what's going on and give me some advice on what I can do? Thanks राजकुमार (talk) 13:55, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @331dot,@Jpgordon and @UtherSRG,I don't know what is happening and nobody is responding to me. Can anyone tell me what I can do? राजकुमार (talk) 13:00, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please be patient, this takes time. 331dot (talk) 13:30, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpgordon: can we treat this as a regular block? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:31, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't apply the CU block, so I don't know what evidence Courcelles had last May. But there's no evidence of any current problems. I say, yeah, let's AGF here and unblock; the edit history on hiwiki looks OK. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 20:39, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh/ Thaks. @Courcelles: Might not circlie back till tomorrow. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:41, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Or does this all need to be done via Raj sahu z (talk · contribs)? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh to heck with it. Unblocking. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 22:17, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot, राजकुमार, UtherSRG, Jpgordon, Deepfriedokra, and Courcelles: राजकुमार's userpage deleted at the editor's request. Please undo without a moment's hesitation if you think this was inappropriate. Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 08:56, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Shirt58, I don't think it was inappropriate. I just want to delete my page. I will not do any mistake which i did in May. राजकुमार^(talk) 09:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As user has been unblocked, it is good to remove that "Scarlet Letter." -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:19, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Shah Of Nowhere. I noticed that you recently removed content from User talk:राजकुमार without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shah Of Nowhere ^talk! 18:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shah Of Nowhere, we already talked about that. please undo your edit. राजकुमार^(talk) 07:52, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As per our policy on blanking of talkpage, WP:CBLANK , This generally is not done except under rare circumstances, such as where public view of the discussion may cause harm to some person or organisation. So please follow the our guidelines and archive it instead of blanking, WP:ARCHIVENOTDELETE. Shah Of Nowhere ^talk! 00:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]