User talk:Bstewart330
Benjamin Stewart has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]
A tag has been placed on Benjamin Stewart requesting that it be deleted as it appears to be an autobiography of a non-notable person. See Wikipedia's guidelines on autobiographies for more information. If you need some help, please put a message on my talk page or put {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will soon show up to answer your questions. Thanks! --///Jrothwell (talk)/// 18:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeffrey Boutwell (January 18)[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeffrey Boutwell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Bstewart330!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Star Mississippi 03:31, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
|
Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bstewart330. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Girth Summit (blether) 15:44, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
- At the sockpuppet investigation, you denied engaging in sockpuppetry; if you want to edit here, you are going to have to explain why you created multiple accounts, and why you edited the same draft using them - that does indeed look rather fishy. Girth Summit (blether) 15:46, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Girth Summit, please cite your proof that our accounts are linked or we are the same person. You stated "the other accounts are Confirmed to one another," and, "You are going to have to explain why you created multiple accounts." I'm assuming you did research to confirm this before you blocked and endorsed people as cheaters. Bstewart330 (talk) 22:46, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- As the block notice says, I used the Checkuser tool to establish the connection between your accounts. Policy prohibits me from disclosing what I see using the tool; if it is your contention that I have erred, and that the accounts are unconnected, you can submit an unblock request by following the instructions in the block notice, and another CU will take a look. Girth Summit (blether) 09:21, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- Girth Summit, please cite your proof that our accounts are linked or we are the same person. You stated "the other accounts are Confirmed to one another," and, "You are going to have to explain why you created multiple accounts." I'm assuming you did research to confirm this before you blocked and endorsed people as cheaters. Bstewart330 (talk) 22:46, 12 February 2023 (UTC)