User talk:Bunsik

Welcome[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.
I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! — Anita5192 (talk) 15:28, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm CurryTime7-24. I noticed that you recently removed content from 20th-century music without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 05:27, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. I think it was a mistake that was made during the correction process. But I still don't know where the problem is. I don't know it because it wasn't intentional. My only purpose was to add "Music in South Korea." Sorry.. Bunsik (talk) 08:49, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What "correction process" results in one entry being replaced with another? —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 02:45, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at History of paper, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Julietdeltalima (talk) 12:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Tteokbokki. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DreamRimmer (talk) 14:27, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at History of banking. Please do not elaborate on or add information beyond what is present in your cited sources. Please see WP:OR and WP:SYNTH for more details. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 02:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Synorem. I noticed that you recently removed content from Economy of South Korea without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Synorem (talk) 15:23, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The World Bank classifies Korea as an advanced country, but the 2011 quote shows Korea as an emerging market, so I deleted it because I thought it might confuse the viewer, 13 years later. But, from next time on, I will indicate the reason before deleting it. I am sorry for the confusion. May I delete the phrase? Bunsik (talk) 15:43, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Korean citations[edit]

Please stop citing text with a Korean website as you did here at Literature and here at Drama. This is the English-language Wikipedia. Citations should be in English. If using another language is unavoidable, try to provide a translation, or get help at Wikipedia:Embassy. Do not expect readers to translate your content themselves, not even when modern browsers have machine translation built-in.—Anita5192 (talk) 15:44, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have corrected what you have pointed out: change to English website. Bunsik (talk) 15:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Happy editing!

—Anita5192 (talk) 16:23, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Convenience store, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Delivery and Black bean. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:46, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

Despite the messages you have received, you have continued to add material to articles for which you have provided no citation to any source. Sometimes you have not provided a citation at all, but more often you have provided what appear to be citations, but which on checking turn out not to support the statements that you have posted; that is far worse than providing no citation at all, as it risks misleading readers into believing that what you have posted is supported by reliable sources, when it isn't. For illustration, in this edit you added numerous statements which are not supported by cited sources, including, but by no means limited to the following. You said "Incheon International Airport is the fourth best airport in the world as of 2023", but the reference you cited does not say anything about that at all. You said "[South Korea] is the world's largest spender on R&D per GDP", and cited as a reference a page giving a classification of countries based on the proportion of degrees awarded which are for science, technology, engineering, or mathematics; it does not mention spending on research and development at all. You said "As of 2016, South Korea ranked ninth in the world in total highway extension", and you didn't give any source at all for that. I emphasise that these are merely a few example to illustrate the point; the size of the problem with your editing is well beyond what these examples show in themselves.

Since posting messages asking you to change your approach has not worked, you have been blocked from editing. When the block is over, please make sure that you edit in accordance with Wikipedia's policies on guidelines, including the requirement for citations to reliable sources for article content, and please take heed of messages from editors drawing your attention to mistakes.

At present the block is set to last for 2 days, but if you believe there are good reasons why unblocking you earlier will benefit the project, you may request an unblock. To do so, first read the guide to appealing blocks, and then add the text "{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}" at the bottom of this talk page, replacing the words "Your reason here" with appropriate text. JBW (talk) 22:19, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bunsik. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 12[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sitcom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Men and Women.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]