User talk:Burner50

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ketamine[edit]

There is no evidence to suggest that Keatmine causes respiratory depression or arrest. There is evidence to the contrary that Ketamine actually promotes respiratory drive and promotes airway dilation. [1] Burner50 (talk) 23:52, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 18:53, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Information icon Hi Burner50! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Generalrelative (talk) 18:53, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


I posted the information on this very talk page, which neither editor has debated or even responded to. I'd thank you to leave information that is directly contradictory to established science and wikiepedia's own page on the topic.

The appropriate place to discuss this is at the article talk page. I've started a conversation there: Talk:Excited_delirium#Disputed_edit. Best, Generalrelative (talk) 19:03, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I will move this topic there. Burner50 (talk) 19:06, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Firefangledfeathers. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I think all of us, including you, are engaged in good-faith efforts to improve the article. We just disagree about how best to do so. Please do not refer to the contributions of other good-faith editors as "vandalism", as doing so is a personal attack. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved my conversation regarding this topic to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Excited_delirium#Disputed_edit
I'd thank you to continue there. Burner50 (talk) 19:23, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have already been warned about civility just above. And yet you proceeded to make this comment after being warned. Please be advised that deliberately mischaracterizing others is not allowed on Wikipedia (per WP:TALKNO), and that continuing to behave in this way may result in sanctions. Also: your personal talk page is indeed the appropriate place to discuss your behavior. The article talk page is the appropriate place to discus article content. Generalrelative (talk) 16:57, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]