User talk:Buttons0603/2013

Proposed deletion of January 2013 Great Britain and Ireland snowfall[edit]

The article January 2013 Great Britain and Ireland snowfall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTCRYSTAL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 22:31, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've expanded this a bit to include the snowfall earlier in the week, but you may want to come back to this as it'll need more work doing to it. Paul MacDermott (talk) 16:06, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of January 2013 Great Britain and Ireland snowfall for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article January 2013 Great Britain and Ireland snowfall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/January 2013 Great Britain and Ireland snowfall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jeremy (talk) 01:36, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Explosions?[edit]

Additional bombs were defused on site and the FBI is calling it terrorism. That's good enough for us. Don't change it again. Either you were deliberately trolling or there's something wrong with you. Viriditas (talk) 06:14, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for St Jude storm[edit]

On 21 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article St Jude storm, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a man was killed in the St Jude storm by flying tiles? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/St Jude storm. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:04, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh what an honour! Thanks very much. :) GeorgeGriffiths (talk) 20:01, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited British Rail Class 01/5, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shipley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]