User talk:C. Ronaldo Aveiro

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

C. Ronaldo Aveiro, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi C. Ronaldo Aveiro! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

International Goals AfD[edit]

You can't add more articles to an AfD once editors have started commenting on the original like this, they need their own article. I will set this up for you. Fenix down (talk) 14:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Fenix down: Thanks. — C. Ronaldo Aveiro (talk) 14:33, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also, you need to be informing the list creator that you are nominating these for AfD as well. Please check the history of each list, find the creator and leave a message with a link to the AfD discussion and the list itself on their talk page. Fenix down (talk) 14:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Fenix down: Will do. C. Ronaldo Aveiro (talk) 14:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I appreciate your efforts in considering the notability of these lists and also understand that the process for doing so is quite cumbersome and complicated. However, could you please ensure that you fully understand WP:AFDHOWTO before nominating any more. If you use WP:TWINKLE, this can help- the process a fair bit by automating it ensuring that the correct tags and notices are placedo n the correct pages. Fenix down (talk) 14:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Fenix down: Will try my best, mate. Thank you. C. Ronaldo Aveiro (talk) 14:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, let me know if you need any help. Fenix down (talk) 14:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Fenix down: Definitely. Since I'm new in Wikipedia, I'll ask you about something that I don't know or can't understand. C. Ronaldo Aveiro (talk) 14:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please do, I'm happy to field any questions you have. Fenix down (talk) 14:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You seem to be making the same mistakes still. Please do not add articles to existing AfDs where other editors have already commented. If you wish to nominate a new list, you will have to go through the steps above afresh. Fenix down (talk) 13:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Fenix down: Please see it now. C. Ronaldo Aveiro (talk) 15:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Nice work on creating the various List of international goals lists. BiHVolim (talk) 12:00, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@BiHVolim: Thanks a lot, mate! CR7 (talk) 13:05, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of international goals scored by Agustín Delgado is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international goals scored by Agustín Delgado until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Qed237 (talk) 14:30, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Result: Nomination withdrawn by nominator. CR7 (talk) 12:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anarchyte was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
List of top international association football appearance-makers by country, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

333-blue 12:45, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at WT:FOOTY regarding an article you created[edit]

For your information, we are currently discussing List of biggest wins in association football history, an article you created and significantly contributed to, at WT:FOOTY, here. --Theurgist (talk) 14:36, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Advice[edit]

An administrator has indefinitely blocked this account for being a sockpuppet of SWASTIK 25. Creating multiple accounts to violate Wikipedia policies is itself a violation of policy and it's not going to win you any friends here. Since you, the editor behind SWASTIK 25, are not welcome to edit here, any edit you make can be reverted by any user with no regard for whether it was helpful or not. Any article or category or anything you create can (and very likely will) be deleted. Sockpuppetry is disruptive and is not tolerated, so if you continue to waste the community's time, you should be prepared to have your own time wasted as well. Now, my advice to you is: take the standard offer. Disappear for six months, and by that I mean stop editing entirely. At the end of that six months, you can request your first account be unblocked, so long as you demonstrate to the reviewing administrator that you understand why you were blocked, and put forth a convincing promise that you will not disrupt the encyclopedia again. If you keep going down this childish path of sockpuppetry, you're just going to irritate more and more people who will make it a personal crusade to stymie your contributions. Take the smart approach. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:34, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, C. Ronaldo Aveiro. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]