User talk:CAWilson52

Welcome![edit]

Hello, CAWilson52, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Zad68 20:32, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Continued from User_talk:BeyondXXY,Inc[edit]

Thanks for being understanding about Wikipedia's policies requiring the use of this new account.

Can you post the link to the updated article to Talk:Klinefelter syndrome‎? That way the editors there can review it and see if can be used. Zad68 20:35, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK if I have more than one?CAWilson52 (talk) 20:42, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but if I were you, I'd propose changes in small chunks instead of a wholesale rewrite. Also, be sure to review WP:MEDRS first, for journal articles we're looking for PubMed-listed, MEDLINE-indexed secondary sources like review articles, by appropriately-credentialed scientists, published in reputable journals. No primary studies, generally. If you post a bunch of "bad" ones and maybe one or two "good" ones you'll have a hard time getting editors to pay attention, you'd probably be better off limiting your list to just the best sources that meet the WP:MEDRS standards. Zad68 20:48, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CAWilson52, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi CAWilson52! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:18, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Non-Klinefelter XXY was accepted[edit]

Non-Klinefelter XXY, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LukeSurl^{t c} 23:25, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your edits. A small point, Minour edits are for very small changes to the encyclopedia, such as spelling and grammar fixes. An edits such as this should not be flagged as minor, and ideally should be accompanied by an edit summary. Thanks, --LukeSurl^{t c} 17:15, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

=====Thank you LukeSurl for the information. Actually someone added that based on anecdotal information and cited one study that produced data of less than 2% of XXYs are self identified transexuals, which is an entirely different matter. I will add that into the summary. CAWilson52 (talk) 01:15, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Non-Klinefelter XXY for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Non-Klinefelter XXY is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-Klinefelter XXY until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Novangelis (talk) 16:39, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Non-Klinefelter XXY for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Non-Klinefelter XXY is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-Klinefelter XXY (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LukeSurl^{t c} 16:02, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]