User talk:CHinds89

Welcome[edit]

Hello, CHinds89, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:11, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you.--Orange Mike | Talk 23:59, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

wikipedia policies[edit]

One of the prime policies regarding content at Wikipedia, is that if content is challenged, it MUST NOT be restored unless it is accompanied by a citation to a reliably published source that validates the claim. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:10, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

verification is one of the content policies and citing the subjects website would clear that part of the content requirements, but you would still have to address WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:NPOV and it would do nothing to address THE biggest issue of notability which requires that in order for there to be an article at Wikipedia, reliable sources OTHER than the subject have taken notice of the subject -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:24, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, if the only people who have written about it are the people who created it and the places they work for, it does not meet the level of "notability" that Wikipedia requires for a stand alone encyclopedia article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:36, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:ATD for some of the options that might be appropriate other than deletion. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:49, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of The Cultural Competency Organizational Assessment-360[edit]

Please see my reply at User talk:Davewild#Deletion of The Cultural Competency Organizational Assessment-360 and if you have any query about that, then you can reply there. Thanks. Davewild (talk) 16:53, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas A. LaVeist (July 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thomas A. LaVeist and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 16:04, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! CHinds89, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 16:04, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas A. LaVeist has been accepted[edit]

Thomas A. LaVeist, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 07:33, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]