User talk:CLCStudent/Archive 199

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 195 Archive 197 Archive 198 Archive 199 Archive 200 Archive 201 Archive 205

AIV Report

Hi - I wanted to reach out quickly about your recent report of Are.u.sure at AIV. I'm not trying to give you a hard time - I hope you know that I hold you in exceedingly high regard for your prolific counter-vandalism work - but when investigated the edits, it wasn't obvious to me how you arrived at the conclusion of vandalism. This seems, from looking at the source, to be an improvement - I haven't gone back through the history, but I wonder if it's a revert of old vandalism, since the source seems to support the number that they changed to. This and this I'm not sure about - the assertions aren't sourced so clearly, and the paywalls make it difficult to check. I can't say for sure that it's not vandalism, but I can't clearly see that it is, so I wanted to get your take on why you think it is. I do think there are some red flags - the account hasn't edited for years, and the username is a bit dubious - but without proper access to the sources, and the time to read through them, I'm struggling to arrive at a clear-cut vandalism diagnosis. I'm eager to hear your thoughts on it. Thanks again for your enormous efforts to keep our articles free of vandalism. GirthSummit (blether) 19:58, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

That one might have been a mistake. CLCStudent (talk) 12:53, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Girth Summit, out of curiosity I'm looking at that 300,000 number: the change was probably well-intended, but the text was already completely incorrect. I know, not related, but kind of sad. Drmies (talk) 12:56, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Drmies, mmm - good point. I confess that I didn't read the whole article - I just looked at the numbers, and saw that the source mentioned 300,000 people having it, and didn't mention 30,000 anywhere. Seems like 300,000 was a pre-1998 estimate, and that it's now less than 1,000 cases per year in Africa - good news! Are you planning to update the article? GirthSummit (blether) 13:03, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Done. I haven't had coffee yet or I'd do a bit more with the article: there are opportunities. Yes, less than 1,000 cases is good news. Imagine a 20-year epidemic, and you still have to go out and grow food: no Instacart, no Amazon, no government to support you. These people in Sub-Saharan Africa are tough. Drmies (talk) 13:06, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Drmies, in the early 2000s, I did a lot of survey work in Nigeria, Cameroon and Cote d'Ivoir - tough, resourceful, and very welcoming for the most part was my experience. GirthSummit (blether) 13:43, 4 April 2020 (UTC)