User talk:CLCStudent/Archive 217
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 210 | ← | Archive 215 | Archive 216 | Archive 217 | Archive 218 | Archive 219 | Archive 220 |
Never Have I ever
You keep reverting my changes but if you scrolled back in the view history page.. username: Dru alexandro had some valid changes with explanation and username: Crispsoaks is sturborn and pushed his or her edit through. So instead of going to my talk page, you should be alerting username: Crispsoaks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Factcheck2020 (talk • contribs) 16:57, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Not sure if this is what you meant about contacting you. But, I edited the prime count function page. At bottom last inequality, said was in citation 31, it is not. At least explicitly, think with some extra work it can be derived from the source, but should not be referenced as containing something that it explicitly does not. Easy to see for yourself. Thought possible that citation was incorrect, so looking into that. Should re-add my note about it. -Shaun
- But still, you have to discuss it on the talkpage and not on the article itself. CLCStudent (talk) 19:05, 13 May 2020 (UTC)